<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Economics Questions</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/5.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Re: Why did the UK national debt stop falling after classical Keynesianism was abandoned?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/459443.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 01:45:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:459443</guid><dc:creator>Consumariat</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/459443.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=459443</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;span style="font-size:14px;"&gt;I&amp;#39;m referring to the abandonment of full employment as a government target, and the adoption of inflation targeting instead. Also, the privatisation of publicly owned industries from the 1980&amp;#39;s onwards (and the related focus on competition policy instead of industrial policy), the deregulation of the financial markets from &amp;#39;86 onwards, and the demutualisation of the building societies.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Why did the UK national debt stop falling after classical Keynesianism was abandoned?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/459439.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 01:25:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:459439</guid><dc:creator>John James</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/459439.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=459439</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/Themes/mises2008/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Consumariat:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;I often hear how Keynesianism is responsible for the debt crisis.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	I don&amp;#39;t know where you heard this or if you just heard it wrong, but that&amp;#39;s a very crude way of putting it that is kind of misleading.&amp;nbsp; The bottom line is &amp;quot;debt crisis&amp;quot; comes from having too much debt.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;This always puzzles me because the UK has since 1979 adopted Neo-Classical (and for a while, Monetarist) policies. The following graph shows quite clearly how the UK national debt was falling steadily all the way through the post-war Keynesian consensus. So why did this trend stop with its abandonment?&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Simply claiming a country adopted &amp;quot;[insert economic school of thought] policies&amp;quot; is again misleading.&amp;nbsp; Perhaps you can point out exactly what these policies you&amp;#39;re talking about were, and when they were enacted and for how long.&amp;nbsp; (And if you could, how they qualify as policies of that particular school of thought).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Why did the UK national debt stop falling after classical Keynesianism was abandoned?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/459437.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 01:10:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:459437</guid><dc:creator>Consumariat</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/459437.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=459437</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;span style="font-size:14px;"&gt;I often hear how Keynesianism is responsible for the debt crisis. This always puzzles me because the UK has since 1979 adopted Neo-Classical (and for a while, Monetarist) policies. The following graph shows quite clearly how the UK national debt was falling steadily all the way through the post-war Keynesian consensus. So why did this trend stop with its abandonment?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;img alt="" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-efA8fMa_z6o/Tmenl9LLmWI/AAAAAAAAAWc/GBZbh8OY1k0/s1600/UK+national+debt+as+percentage+of+GDP+1900+-+2011+PFI+Interventions+and+bailouts+included.jpg" style="width:577px;height:354px;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>