https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/5.aspxenCommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/459635.aspxFri, 02 Mar 2012 18:55:16 GMT944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:459635Smiling Dave0https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/459635.aspxhttps://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&PostID=459635<blockquote> <p> Shostak and Kel Kelly are my favourite writers on this website.</p> </blockquote> <p> Same here.</p> <p> My take:</p> <p> Shostak&#39;s theme is always remember to look at things, not money.</p> <p> Kelly&#39;s is exposing the statistics.</p><div style="clear:both;"></div>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/459611.aspxFri, 02 Mar 2012 14:45:55 GMT944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:459611Vladimir Ulyanov0https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/459611.aspxhttps://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&PostID=459611<p> Well I don&#39;t think much of the articles are dicussed on these forums unless somebody fails to understand an article or disagrees with it. But I agree. Shostak and Kel Kelly are my favourite writers on this website.</p><div style="clear:both;"></div>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/459596.aspxFri, 02 Mar 2012 13:21:30 GMT944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:459596aervew0https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/459596.aspxhttps://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&PostID=459596<p> Shostak&#39;s writing a lot of interesting articles yet there is little discussion on &#39;em in the forums. Whats up with that? Is there some kind of taboo, or he is wrong, not popular? Whats going on.</p><div style="clear:both;"></div>