<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Economics Questions</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/5.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Re: Human Action: Econ treaties or Austrian Sociology Treaties</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/460254.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 21:14:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:460254</guid><dc:creator>vive la insurrection</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/460254.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=460254</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	I certainly have more of a sociology hat than an econ hat - being that I have probably at least a 101 grip on all the basic social sciences.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;What I wonder is, if sociology could be looked at as the &amp;quot;starting point&amp;quot; for the social sciences (when looked at&amp;nbsp;in a responsible manner); and that econ is derived from sociology - or should it be the other way around?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Either way, I&amp;nbsp;think there should be a geneology of sorts for the SS in order for them to make sense - and it is important to say why it exists that way - and that it would be impossible for one to work in one field without ones head being in another.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Human Action: Econ treaties or Austrian Sociology Treaties</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/460164.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 00:43:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:460164</guid><dc:creator>Bert</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/460164.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=460164</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	When I explain AE to people I explain it as sociology, not through an &lt;em&gt;economic&lt;/em&gt; lense, but through an &lt;em&gt;individual&lt;/em&gt; lense and their relation and interaction with society.&amp;nbsp; I can purvey the message I need to, but in a more fashionable language.&amp;nbsp; I feel that when I explain economics, people view it as a mundane science that has no real affect on their surroundings and life, and preconcieved notions of the stance that AE has may create some bias.&amp;nbsp; If I start off with subjectivity and individualism and interweave them, then it may already be appealing to the other person.&amp;nbsp; I don&amp;#39;t believe anyone would try to refute that &lt;em&gt;humans act&lt;/em&gt;, and if I make the &lt;em&gt;individual&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;subjectivity&lt;/em&gt; my starting points and then expand into that individual&amp;#39;s relation, cooperation, and growth in society, well, I may already have them &amp;quot;hooked&amp;quot; so to speak, and the foundation is already laid.&amp;nbsp; From there I can branch out.&amp;nbsp; Also, sociology seems more fashionable than economics, start utilizing that language and those arguments with said axioms/starting points, and more people may be attraced to AE.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Human Action: Econ treaties or Austrian Sociology Treaties</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/460138.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 22:02:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:460138</guid><dc:creator>vive la insurrection</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/460138.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=460138</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	Autolykos and I briefly brought this up in another thread by Wheylous:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://mises.org/Community/forums/t/28392.aspx"&gt;http://mises.org/Community/forums/t/28392.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	- and I forgot Ludwig Lachmann mentioned it here at the 42:00 mark:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QdymByxT1Gg"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QdymByxT1Gg&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	That the book Human Action is not an Austrian Economics book, but&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;&lt;u&gt;the&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/em&gt; book of a comprehensive look at the Austrian view of the social sciences.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>