<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Economics Questions</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/5.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Re: Pro-market articles on Enron</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/488460.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 15:01:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:488460</guid><dc:creator>Bogart</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/488460.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=488460</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	Enron&amp;#39;s could not even rule a regulated market where competition can bet held back by prepurchased government force.&amp;nbsp; How in the world could an Enron rule when competitors could enter and leave at will into every business Enron had.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Furthermore, Enron&amp;#39;s profits came from two sources: 1. Moving Natural Gas and 2. Making profitable deals with government.&amp;nbsp; Neither of these seems to me to allow Enron to rule.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Pro-market articles on Enron</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/488459.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 14:44:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:488459</guid><dc:creator>Wheylous</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/488459.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=488459</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	Gero (bless his heart) was doing his usual link roundup and I found this article among his links:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/enron-dependent-on-government/"&gt;http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/enron-dependent-on-government/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Included is this one:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://www.econlib.org/library/Columns/y2012/Bradleyenron.html"&gt;http://www.econlib.org/library/Columns/y2012/Bradleyenron.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	I haven&amp;#39;t read them yet, but it seems like we could use these are references when defending claims that in the free market Enrons would rule.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	I&amp;#39;d also like to remind people that Woods in&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Meltdown&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;defends shorting by pointing out that it is what helped bring down Enron.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>