<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Economics Questions</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/5.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Re: Tugwit is at it again</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/518680.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 22:45:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:518680</guid><dc:creator>Neodoxy</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/518680.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=518680</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	Well f***ing derp.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Tugwit is at it again</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/518677.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 22:20:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:518677</guid><dc:creator>Wheylous</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/518677.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=518677</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-ticker/economic-argument-over-paul-krugman-won-150247189.html"&gt;http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-ticker/economic-argument-over-paul-krugman-won-150247189.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
	&lt;p style="margin:11px 0px 0px;padding:0px;font-family:Georgia, Times, &amp;#39;Times New Roman&amp;#39;, serif;font-size:14px;line-height:22.453125px;"&gt;
		An academic paper that found that a ratio of 90%-debt-to-GDP was a threshold above which countries experienced slow or no economic growth was found to contain an &lt;strong&gt;arithmetic calculation error&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p style="margin:11px 0px 0px;padding:0px;font-family:Georgia, Times, &amp;#39;Times New Roman&amp;#39;, serif;font-size:14px;line-height:22.453125px;"&gt;
		Once the error was corrected, the &amp;quot;90% debt-to-GDP threshold&amp;quot; instantly disappeared.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Dammit, Tugwit!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>