<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Economics Questions</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/5.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Re: what is the proof for the marginal theory of value...</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/82988.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 13:38:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:82988</guid><dc:creator>nirgrahamUK</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/82988.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=82988</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;thedesolateone gave some great short answers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;for a beefier version http://mises.org/etexts/menger/three.asp &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;carl menger , principles of economics&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: what is the proof for the marginal theory of value...</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/82987.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 13:37:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:82987</guid><dc:creator>Jon Irenicus</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/82987.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=82987</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;It merely states that one will aim to satisfy their most urgent preferences first, second-most urgent next etc. It&amp;#39;s a matter of logic.&amp;nbsp; The &amp;quot;subjectively&amp;quot; isn&amp;#39;t circular. All value resides in the an agent perceives an object&amp;#39;s ability to alleviate their wants.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: what is the proof for the marginal theory of value...</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/82953.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 10:19:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:82953</guid><dc:creator>Thedesolateone</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/82953.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=82953</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Equally; do you have anything which you think is great and others think is awful. Any music you love and others don&amp;#39;t. Any films you love which others can&amp;#39;t stand?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: what is the proof for the marginal theory of value...</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/82952.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 10:17:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:82952</guid><dc:creator>Thedesolateone</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/82952.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=82952</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;It is true merely by thinking about it;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why would anyone buy anything if they didn&amp;#39;t value the good higher than the money spent?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why would anyone sell anything if they didn&amp;#39;t value the money gained higher than the good?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In that you have it; the value of the good is different to those two people, and hence the value is subjective. Obviously there are numerous other examples.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>what is the proof for the marginal theory of value...</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/82939.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 08:45:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:82939</guid><dc:creator>fakename</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/82939.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=5&amp;PostID=82939</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;...as conceived by austrians?&amp;nbsp; I think that it is proved by assuming that the next good in a series is valued at more than the preceeding ones and from that you derive the contradiction that exchanges wouldn&amp;#39;t take place because there could not be a time when the value to be gained is greater than the value to be lost -subjectively.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Then again, my explaination seems circular on second thought due to the &amp;quot;subjectively&amp;quot; qualification.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The fact is I am woefully uneducated about the exact, logical, reason behind the austrian marginal theory and I&amp;#39;ve never read anything that explains it in the context of austrian tradition.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>