<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>History</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/71.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Re: The Emergence of the London Stock Exchange as a Self-Policing Club, Edward Stringham George Mason University</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/256654.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 11:05:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:256654</guid><dc:creator>hayekianxyz</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/256654.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=71&amp;PostID=256654</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#39;s a shame this isn&amp;#39;t getting much attention, it&amp;#39;s a really good recommendation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Other Stringham papers of interest: &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.gmu.edu/departments/economics/pboettke/pubs/articles/stringhamboettkemanagerialfinance2004.pdf"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;and &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.sjsu.edu/stringham/docs/Stringham.2003.QREF.Amsterdam.pdf"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. There&amp;#39;s more over at his webpage for anybody interested. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Emergence of the London Stock Exchange as a Self-Policing Club, Edward Stringham George Mason University</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/256485.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 23:47:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:256485</guid><dc:creator>nirgrahamUK</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/256485.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=71&amp;PostID=256485</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;May be of interest to historians of liberty like laughing-man and lilburne,&lt;br /&gt;and to those people interested in the economics and history of private production of law and enforcement&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.biblioteca.ufm.edu.gt/apee/pdf/999610.pdf"&gt;http://www.biblioteca.ufm.edu.gt/apee/pdf/999610.pdf&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Conclusion&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;lt;
Although there may be good reason to worry that in a&lt;br /&gt;
complicated stock market there are greater chances of fraud, it seems&lt;br /&gt;
clear that there was no missing market in this realm. Rather than&lt;br /&gt;
relying on public regulation to enforce contracts, brokers consciously&lt;br /&gt;
found a way to solve this dilemma by creating and enforcing a system&lt;br /&gt;
of private rules. Since it was their goal to promote trade, the interest&lt;br /&gt;
of the members was aligned with the interest of its customers. It was&lt;br /&gt;
their ability to experiment and their need to attract business that&lt;br /&gt;
allowed for the discovery of better ways of organizing and selfregulating.&lt;br /&gt;
Under laissez faire, firms and clubs, such as the London&lt;br /&gt;
Stock Exchange, can choose to organize in any way they wish, and&lt;br /&gt;
those thatfind successful ways of operating will flourish.18 Since the London&lt;br /&gt;
Stock Exchange did not have a legal monopoly, it needed to make&lt;br /&gt;
sure that its existence was beneficial. Dennis Carlton writes, AIt is&lt;br /&gt;
useful to view exchanges as competing (or potentially competing)&lt;br /&gt;
with each other. As in other markets, competition is a substitute for&lt;br /&gt;
regulation. The more competition there is, the more likely it is that&lt;br /&gt;
exchanges themselves will promulgate rules and regulations that&lt;br /&gt;
benefit and protect consumers in much the same ways as competition&lt;br /&gt;
in other markets protects consumers@ (Carlton, 1984:259). When&lt;br /&gt;
exchanges are free to organize without government regulation it&lt;br /&gt;
allows for the discovery process of the market to operate. In their&lt;br /&gt;
quest for more profits, brokers will have the incentive to discover&lt;br /&gt;
better ways of self-policing. The evolution of the London Stock&lt;br /&gt;
Exchange provides evidence that beneficial regulations can be created&lt;br /&gt;
through the market.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>