<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>History</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/71.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Re: Articles of confederation</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/365792.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2010 21:45:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:365792</guid><dc:creator>Sieben</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/365792.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=71&amp;PostID=365792</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	Thanks for those links. I was wondering if there were any lectures or podcasts I could listen to...? :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Articles of confederation</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/365786.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2010 20:47:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:365786</guid><dc:creator>BrianAnderson</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/365786.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=71&amp;PostID=365786</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt; The Civil War was ultimately a power struggle, not some bout over ideology. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	I&amp;#39;d say it was a power struggle over ideology. The South was trying to take its own power back by seceding. The North was trying to keep more power by preserving the Union.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Articles of confederation</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/365783.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2010 20:25:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:365783</guid><dc:creator>Azure</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/365783.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=71&amp;PostID=365783</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	Off the top of my head, the big changes for the CSA was the line item veto, the requirement for bills to pertain to only one subject (i.e. no &amp;quot;pork&amp;quot;), and the allowing of only 1 term for presidential office.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	And there&amp;#39;s the slavery thing but everyone knows about that.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	It was basically the same as the Union&amp;#39;s. The Civil War was ultimately a power struggle, not some bout over ideology.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Articles of confederation</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/365781.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2010 20:06:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:365781</guid><dc:creator>Marko</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/365781.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=71&amp;PostID=365781</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	To take advantage of this thread: What about some analysis of the Constitution of the CSA?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	And if they were Confederate States, why didn&amp;#39;t they have Articles of Confederation instead?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Articles of confederation</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/365743.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2010 16:28:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:365743</guid><dc:creator>Runyan</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/365743.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=71&amp;PostID=365743</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;div&gt;
	Rethinking the Articles of Confederation&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
	Mises Daily: Friday, August 08, 2003 by H.A. Scott Trask&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://mises.org/daily/1296"&gt;http://mises.org/daily/1296&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
	Secession, State, &amp;amp; Liberty edited by David Gordon&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://mises.org/books/secession_state_liberty.pdf"&gt;http://mises.org/books/secession_state_liberty.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
	Articles of Confederation, 29, 54,116,119,160,162-63,176 Article XllI, 162&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;
		as league of friendship, 8,115&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;
		formed by sovereign states, 10&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;
		secession and, 25, 35, 162&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;
		state sovereignty and, 118, 162&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;
		text of, 291-98&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
	From the index of Conceived in Liberty 4th Volume:&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://mises.org/books/conceived4.pdf"&gt;http://mises.org/books/conceived4.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Articles of Confederation, 244, 246, 247, 249, 253-56, 369, 371, 372, 389, 392, 395, 396, 398, 401, 407, 409, 413, 414, 415, 448,449; Article Two, 253,254; Article Twelve, 255&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Rothbard&amp;#39;s primary source for the above (he does take issue with at least one of the author&amp;#39;s interpretations [p254 CiL v4]):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	M&amp;eacute;rrill Jensen, The Articles of Confederation: An Interpretation of the Social-Constitutional&lt;br /&gt;
	History of the American Revolution, 1774-1781. (Madison, Wise: University of Wisconsin&lt;br /&gt;
	Press, 1962 &lt;a href="http://www.worldcat.org/title/articles-of-confederation-an-interpretation-of-the-social-constitutional-history-of-the-american-revolution-1774-1781/oclc/8713552"&gt;http://www.worldcat.org/title/articles-of-confederation-an-interpretation-of-the-social-constitutional-history-of-the-american-revolution-1774-1781/oclc/8713552&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Articles of confederation</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/365733.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2010 15:05:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:365733</guid><dc:creator>Sieben</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/365733.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=71&amp;PostID=365733</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	I know nothing about them. Mises media only has a short chapter by rothbard. Whats some good media on them?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>