<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>History</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/71.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>What they thought in 1932</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/427323.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2011 20:45:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:427323</guid><dc:creator>Smiling Dave</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/427323.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=71&amp;PostID=427323</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;em&gt;...on July 5, 1932, The Times of&lt;br /&gt;
	London published a letter to the editor signed by 41 prominent economics&lt;br /&gt;
	professors across the UK, including Keynes.&amp;nbsp; The letter blamed &amp;ldquo;the great&lt;br /&gt;
	fall in wholesale prices&amp;rdquo; since 1930 for the most serious evil of the&lt;br /&gt;
	economic crisis.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;em&gt;Although some prices can adjust downward as well as&lt;br /&gt;
	upward in response to supply and demand changes, it was claimed, other&lt;br /&gt;
	prices were &amp;ldquo;relatively inflexible,&amp;rdquo; thereby creating &amp;ldquo;serious&lt;br /&gt;
	maladjustments throughout the economic system.&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp; Those prices that are&lt;br /&gt;
	adjustable, then, need to be raised to where they were before the crisis began.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;em&gt;This could be done by private spending, monetary easing, tax&lt;br /&gt;
	rebates, and public investment... &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;em&gt;Under the heading &amp;ldquo;Fresh Money for&lt;br /&gt;
	Spending,&amp;rdquo; the letter exhorted private individuals and institutions to&lt;br /&gt;
	assist &amp;ldquo;by &lt;strong&gt;spending money according to their capacity&lt;/strong&gt;.&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp; The sentence&lt;br /&gt;
	following this passage is explicit about how presumptions about capacity&lt;br /&gt;
	to spend should be set:&amp;nbsp; &amp;ldquo;&lt;strong&gt;In cases of doubt, the patriotic motive should&lt;br /&gt;
	weigh on the side of expenditures rather than economy&lt;/strong&gt;.&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp; Finally, the&lt;br /&gt;
	government should alleviate the sense of uncertainty that was provoking&lt;br /&gt;
	public fears of inflation by declaring its commitment to this new policy in&lt;br /&gt;
	advance, and not use re-inflation as an excuse to engage in competitive&lt;br /&gt;
	devaluation of the pound, which would worsen the world situation.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>