<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Political Theory</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/8.aspx</link><description>Discussion of political theory.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Re: Intellectual Property in Architecture</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/120185.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 12:48:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:120185</guid><dc:creator>FreedomIsYellow</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/120185.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&amp;PostID=120185</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/Themes/mises2008/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;makaveli71:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;But, I think anything creative/abstract like art or architecture should belong to its creator&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yes, of course it should belong to it&amp;#39;s creator. As should the designs, plans, etc.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But should anyone take a photo and create an exact replica there would be nothing you could do, providing of course that they don&amp;#39;t transgress any property of yours. However, If they tried to sell what they had copied and pass it off as created by you then they would be committing fraud.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;&amp;quot;Imitation is the most sincere form of flattery&amp;quot; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;i&gt;&amp;quot;If &lt;em&gt;creativity&lt;/em&gt; is a field, &lt;em&gt;copyright is the fence&lt;/em&gt;.&amp;quot;&lt;/i&gt; -John Oswald&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Intellectual Property in Architecture</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/120130.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 09:58:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:120130</guid><dc:creator>nibbler491</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/120130.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&amp;PostID=120130</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Nope. I can&amp;#39;t see any distinction between architecture and any other field dealing with IP that would lead you to this conclusion, outside of your own personal bias.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Intellectual Property in Architecture</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/120090.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 08:06:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:120090</guid><dc:creator>makaveli71</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/120090.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&amp;PostID=120090</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;First let me being by saying, I&amp;#39;m still an undergraduate student in architecture. However, at the beginning of my academic endeavor, I remember reading about the concept of academic property. Essentially, in a design process it can act as protection against people stealing your ideas and concepts- written, drawn or simply just spoken. And, in reading about it, I enjoyed the protection that it would give me to share my thoughts. Since then, I&amp;#39;ve become more politically minded and more Misesian (I&amp;#39;ve seen the light, in a sense, haha). I understand and agree that copyrights and patents only impede progression in certain industries, but does this concept of intellectual property ownership/freedom also translate into architecture? I feel like it shouldn&amp;#39;t, but maybe that&amp;#39;s selfish of me, because it would benefit me, to protect my ideas in this way. But, I think anything creative/abstract like art or architecture should belong to its creator (though, I wouldn&amp;#39;t own the photos taken&amp;nbsp;of my buildings, or art pieces).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any thoughts?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>