<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Political Theory</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/8.aspx</link><description>Discussion of political theory.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Paul Graham's interesting essay</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/21244.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:10:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:21244</guid><dc:creator>Miklos Hollender</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/21244.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&amp;PostID=21244</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#39;s an good one I think - rarely I see such a well-worded defense of capitalism: &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.paulgraham.com/gap.html%20"&gt;http://www.paulgraham.com/gap.html&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I like especially this idea:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;&amp;quot;&lt;font face="verdana" size="2"&gt;Part of the reason this subject is so contentious is that some
of those most vocal on the subject of wealth—university
students, heirs, professors, politicians, and journalists—have
the least experience creating it.  (This phenomenon will be familiar
to anyone who has overheard conversations about sports in a bar.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Students are mostly still on the parental dole, and have not stopped
to think about where that money comes from.  Heirs will be on the
parental dole for life.  Professors and politicians live within
socialist eddies of the economy, at one remove from the creation
of wealth, and are paid a flat rate regardless of how hard they
work.  And journalists as part of their professional code segregate
themselves from the revenue-collecting half of the businesses they
work for (the ad sales department).  Many of these people never
come face to face with the fact that the money they receive represents
wealth—wealth that, except in the case of journalists, someone
else created earlier.  They live in a world in which income is
doled out by a central authority according to some abstract notion
of fairness (or randomly, in the case of heirs), rather than given
by other people in return for something they wanted, so it may seem
to them unfair that things don&amp;#39;t work the same in the rest of the
economy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(Some professors do create a great deal of wealth for
society.  But the money they&amp;#39;re paid isn&amp;#39;t a quid pro quo.
It&amp;#39;s more in the nature of an investment.)&lt;/font&gt;&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>