<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Political Theory</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/8.aspx</link><description>Discussion of political theory.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Re: For States, Nuke = Gun?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/294123.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:34:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:294123</guid><dc:creator>AJ</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/294123.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&amp;PostID=294123</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;If this is so, it&amp;#39;s yet another way that technology seems to be moving toward the dissolution or fragmentation of state power. I&amp;#39;m translating some political negotiations on nuclear disarmament right now, and it seems just by the language they use that nukes are something states take seriously like nothing else. They really treat North Korea with kid gloves. I can see why Iran wants nukes so badly. I can see why all heads of State would want to have them, or at least give the illusion of having them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: For States, Nuke = Gun?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/294097.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 15:44:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:294097</guid><dc:creator>Merlin</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/294097.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&amp;PostID=294097</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p style="margin:0in 0in 0pt;" class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial;"&gt;Well, the State has an inherent need to expand, else it collapses. Still a world of cheap nukes would make war impossible, hence states would continuously break up and reform. The cheaper the nukes, the most numerous the states. It could be said that, should nuclear secrets be widely available and nuclear reactors cheap, hence making nukes costing about a million dollar apiece, I submit that a return to &amp;ldquo;city-states&amp;rdquo; would be &lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;inevitable&lt;/span&gt;, with the all known implications for prosperity. Perhaps nukes are, after all, the only real hope that minarchy ever had. No wonder the US is ready to loose Afghanistan and Iran in a war against Iran, just to keep them from developing nukes. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="margin:0in 0in 0pt;" class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: For States, Nuke = Gun?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/293573.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 01:41:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:293573</guid><dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/293573.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&amp;PostID=293573</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;There is a chapter in The Myth of National Defense that uses a game theoretic agument to argue just that. IMO the case is analogous.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: For States, Nuke = Gun?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/293530.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 22:52:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:293530</guid><dc:creator>Sage</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/293530.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&amp;PostID=293530</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;One thing to consider is that governments can externalize the costs of war (through taxation), so they&amp;#39;re more likely to engage in war.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>For States, Nuke = Gun?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/293522.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 22:21:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:293522</guid><dc:creator>AJ</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/293522.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&amp;PostID=293522</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;If states are in anarchy with respect to each other, do nuclear weapons function like guns for states? If an armed society is a polite society, is a world of armed states a world largely free of inter-state war? Granted nuclear weapons haven&amp;#39;t been ever used against seats of national government, but the prospect has got to scare them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>