<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Political Theory</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/8.aspx</link><description>Discussion of political theory.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Re: Are Austro-libertarians and Anarcho-capitalists inherently existentialists?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/338412.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 11:49:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:338412</guid><dc:creator>William</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/338412.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&amp;PostID=338412</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;As far as the early German subjectivism/perspectivism of Nietzsche, Kierkegaard, and Stirner (and I think some one pointed out recently that of Wittgenstein, though that is beyond me) Austrian economics seems to fit quite&amp;nbsp;well within that school;&amp;nbsp; not so much with the later existentialists such as Buber, Sartre, Camus, etc&amp;nbsp;though.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As far as what to take pride in,&amp;nbsp; that can&amp;#39;t really be answered.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Are Austro-libertarians and Anarcho-capitalists inherently existentialists?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/337730.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 04:40:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:337730</guid><dc:creator>Kylesa</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/337730.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&amp;PostID=337730</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	I know that existentialism is a rather broad terminology, but I&amp;#39;m more referring to a Nitzschean view on existentialism. There are obviously paralells between individualist tendencies of existentialism and of course those of us who are indvidualists. Existentialism seems to be supportive of self-determination and many of our economic principals, such as spontaneous order/emergence and self-organization, etc. You get the point.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	I haven&amp;#39;t read completely into existentialism, I always just knew I was an existentialist and never really sought to broaden my horizons, but I think my view on society and people in general, that you shouldn&amp;#39;t take pride in things like your looks, ethnicity, etc., (pedigree) and rather should pride yourself on accomplishements and merit, is the ultimate form of existentialism, to me. If I&amp;#39;m wrong, feel free to correct me, as this is an area that isn&amp;#39;t discussed a lot, but from what I gather, most libertarians share this same sentiment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Am I wrong (on either point)?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>