<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Political Theory</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/8.aspx</link><description>Discussion of political theory.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Send this to your liberal friends . . .</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/348163.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 06:40:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:348163</guid><dc:creator>resist272727</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/348163.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&amp;PostID=348163</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/44412-did-genius-fail-again-at-goldman-sachs-global-alpha-fund"&gt;http://seekingalpha.com/article/44412-did-genius-fail-again-at-goldman-sachs-global-alpha-fund&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	^^Read this, but first read what I have to say.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Time and time again people fail to understand this.&amp;nbsp; These massive risks taken by Too Big To Fail corporations don&amp;#39;t rationally make sense.&amp;nbsp; That should be pretty obvious to most of us who understand the whole self-interest aspect of the free market.&amp;nbsp; Why would they take such huge risks if they could ultimately be doomed . . . and should they be allowed to do so if it will be so devistating to our economy as a whole?&amp;nbsp; Shouldn&amp;#39;t there be some massive regulations to keep the monster in the cage?&amp;nbsp; This thinking makes sense in the current situation . . . but there is obviously a much bigger problem that is at the root of all of this nonsense.&amp;nbsp; A very &lt;em&gt;irrational&lt;/em&gt; third party.&amp;nbsp; That&amp;#39;s right . . . the one and only . . . who we all know and love . . . the big ever-giving Federal Reserve always there to save the day.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	But we all know that&amp;#39;s not the case.&amp;nbsp; And this article, written in August &amp;#39;07 in the midst of disaster as Goldman Sachs was about to bite the dust&amp;nbsp;,&amp;nbsp;explains that very shortly but also very bluntly at the near-end.&amp;nbsp; These big-risk operations ending in disaster would not be if it were not for the Federal Reserve.&amp;nbsp; What people love to call &amp;quot;unbridled capitalism&amp;quot; in the post-disaster years is a result of a corporatist Ponzi Scheme created by Progressives and &amp;quot;fat-cat bankers&amp;quot; alike.&amp;nbsp; The article is very good, explaining how the huge-risk investments made in the derivatives market were failing and how we were on the doom of collapse.&amp;nbsp; As I was reading it, I was obviously intrigued, but waiting for&amp;nbsp;the author, Michael Shedlock,&amp;nbsp;to get to the heart of the whole situation . . . and he did.&amp;nbsp; He ended his article talking about how central banks were the enablers of risks and the engineers of bubbles and that this cannot last.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	This is something I hope we can share with modern liberals and Democrat supporters, the belief&amp;nbsp;that the Federal Reserve must go . . . and the force yielding Wall Street omnipotent&amp;nbsp;power will go with it.&amp;nbsp; So is regulation the be-all end-all of financial collapses? I don&amp;#39;t think so.&amp;nbsp; No . . . we can&amp;#39;t have the capitalism I know and love until this blood-thirsty animal known as the Federal Reserve is dead once and for all.&amp;nbsp; I&amp;#39;m sure many liberals could potentially fell the same way.&amp;nbsp; But nevertheless, 114 House Democrats jumped ship on their support for Ron Paul&amp;#39;s &amp;quot;Audit the Fed&amp;quot; bill merely two weeks ago.&amp;nbsp; Hopefully more people will realize that this is &lt;em&gt;&lt;u&gt;&lt;strong&gt;NOT&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/em&gt; OK.&amp;nbsp; Overall, the bill failed with a 198-229 vote.&amp;nbsp; 175 Republicans, 23 Democrats.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Now I know a lot of people still don&amp;#39;t understand the terror and magnitude of the Fed.&amp;nbsp; Inform them.&amp;nbsp; If you want something done soon . . . hold your breath and vote Republican.&amp;nbsp; Hopefully they won&amp;#39;t betray us.&amp;nbsp; But if there&amp;#39;s one politician I am almost certain I can count on, it&amp;#39;s Ron Paul.&amp;nbsp; If he can lead his party to salvation, the libertarian cause is just one step closer to reality.&amp;nbsp; But it&amp;#39;ll take a Hell of a lot of informing to get the Democrats on our side, and it must be done through their followers.&amp;nbsp; People like to call Alan Grayson the Democrat&amp;#39;s version of Ron Paul, but he&amp;#39;s a dichotomy when it comes to liberty.&amp;nbsp; We must make the liberals aware of what&amp;#39;s really going on with the Fed and with the corrupt Democrats.&amp;nbsp; I&amp;#39;m sure most conservatives aren&amp;#39;t nearly aware of the extent of it, but it&amp;#39;s unlikely to be an issue with them.&amp;nbsp; Taking down the Fed is the first necessary step to winning back our government and our liberty.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	I Yield the Floor.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>