<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Political Theory</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/8.aspx</link><description>Discussion of political theory.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Re: Is Objectivism a dualistic philosophy?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/369261.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 06:29:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:369261</guid><dc:creator>Initiate</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/369261.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&amp;PostID=369261</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="font-style:normal;margin-bottom:0in;background:none transparent scroll repeat 0% 0%;font-weight:normal;text-decoration:none;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial, sans-serif;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial, sans-serif;"&gt;Yes, this is essentially a statement of the &amp;ldquo;primacy of existence&amp;rdquo; principle, which is just to say consciousness is part of existence, but consciousness does not create existence.&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;p style="font-style:normal;margin-bottom:0in;background:none transparent scroll repeat 0% 0%;font-weight:normal;text-decoration:none;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="font-style:normal;margin-bottom:0in;background:none transparent scroll repeat 0% 0%;font-weight:normal;text-decoration:none;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial, sans-serif;"&gt;As for dualism, Objectivism rejects the mind-body dichotomy and thus is not a dualist philosophy. The law of identity applies to consciousness as everything else.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Is Objectivism a dualistic philosophy?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/369234.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 02:48:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:369234</guid><dc:creator>John Ess</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/369234.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&amp;PostID=369234</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	I think what objectivism is saying that the universe can exist without consciousness (which is short-hand for saying &amp;#39;whatever creatures have consciousness&amp;#39;).&amp;nbsp; That&amp;#39;s what it means by &amp;#39;independent of&amp;#39; (without), rather than just that they are separate.&amp;nbsp; That much is true without having to explain all the details about consciousness.&amp;nbsp; And once that&amp;#39;s established you can&amp;#39;t say it is a dualism.&amp;nbsp; Because reality can exist without an infinite number of things; consciousness is not special.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Dualism doesn&amp;#39;t necessarily say anything about minds and bodies being able to exist without each other (although it could be used to justify an immortal soul/mind that lives on).&amp;nbsp; Just that they are two things.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Objectivism also creates a hierarchy that doesn&amp;#39;t exist in dualism proper.&amp;nbsp; And that is that reality is more fundamental than consciousness.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Dualism doesn&amp;#39;t say mind or body is more fundamental than the other.&amp;nbsp; And in fact somewhat paradoxically pairs them together as inseparable for certain animals.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Is Objectivism a dualistic philosophy?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/369227.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 02:14:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:369227</guid><dc:creator>bcyclwutztht</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/369227.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&amp;PostID=369227</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	Thank you for the replies!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	I need to learn some things about philosophy.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Per&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://mises.org/Community/forums/p/16850/333455.aspx#333455"&gt;this thread&lt;/a&gt;, I think I&amp;#39;ll start with Mises and Clark.&amp;nbsp; Russel looks too biased---i.e. according to reports---for a philosophy noob like me&amp;nbsp;who, due to time restrictions,&amp;nbsp;doesn&amp;#39;t plan on reading widely at first.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Is Objectivism a dualistic philosophy?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/369195.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 21:58:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:369195</guid><dc:creator>I. Ryan</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/369195.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&amp;PostID=369195</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/Themes/mises2008/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;StrangeLoop:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	The phenomenon of &amp;quot;conciousness&amp;quot; is actually a decentralized network of physical processes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	What does &amp;quot;physical process&amp;quot; mean? Does it mean anything publically observable? And what would a centralized &amp;quot;network of physical processes&amp;quot; be, as opposed to a &amp;quot;decentralized&amp;quot; one?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Is Objectivism a dualistic philosophy?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/369173.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 20:33:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:369173</guid><dc:creator>Lagrange multiplier</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/369173.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&amp;PostID=369173</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/Themes/mises2008/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;I. Ryan:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;What does that mean?&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	The phenomenon of &amp;quot;conciousness&amp;quot; is actually a decentralized network of physical processes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Is Objectivism a dualistic philosophy?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/369163.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 20:06:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:369163</guid><dc:creator>I. Ryan</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/369163.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&amp;PostID=369163</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/Themes/mises2008/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;StrangeLoop:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	consciousness is a physical phenomenon&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	What does that mean?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Is Objectivism a dualistic philosophy?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/369116.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 16:23:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:369116</guid><dc:creator>Lagrange multiplier</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/369116.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&amp;PostID=369116</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	Dualism, in the philosophy of mind, typically comes down to substance dualism (cf. Descartes) and property dualism (cf. David Chalmers).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	In regard to substance dualism, the assertion is that consciousness is made of radically different &lt;em&gt;stuff&lt;/em&gt; than the rest of the universe--your body, for instance, has extension and can be broken down, whereas--as Descartes said--your mind has no extension and is unified. Property dualism, holds a monistic outlook (there is only one &lt;em&gt;stuff&lt;/em&gt;), but that substance can exhibit two properties: what is physical and what is mental (in contemporary times, the most famous expositor of this view is David Chalmers).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Now, a consistent materialist or physicalist (such as myself) entirely disbelieves those two dualisms: consciousness is a physical phenomenon, nothing more.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Is Objectivism a dualistic philosophy?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/369109.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 15:10:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:369109</guid><dc:creator>John Ess</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/369109.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&amp;PostID=369109</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	No, consciousness is an effect of matter.&amp;nbsp; What they are saying is that something can exist regardless of if you are conscious of it.&amp;nbsp; Consciousness can&amp;#39;t exist without reality.&amp;nbsp; But reality can exist without consciousness.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	It&amp;#39;s the same as saying that dinosaurs couldn&amp;#39;t exist without reality, but reality now exists without dinosaurs.&amp;nbsp; There is no special dualism for every single thing that comes in and out of existence.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	When you do die, reality will still exist for the rest of us.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Is Objectivism a dualistic philosophy?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/369097.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 10:10:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:369097</guid><dc:creator>bcyclwutztht</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/369097.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&amp;PostID=369097</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	I&amp;#39;m a philosophy noob, but my reading of the wiki definitions of &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Objectivism_%28Ayn_Rand%29"&gt;Objectivism&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dualism"&gt;dualism&lt;/a&gt; tells me that&amp;nbsp;Objectivism is a dualistic philosophy.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	wiki-&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	D- dualism (re: philsophy of mind)- any of a narrow variety of views about the relationship between mind and matter, which claims that mind and matter are two ontologically separate categories.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	D- Objectivism holds that reality exists independent of consciousness, that man has direct contact with reality through sense perception, that one can attain objective knowledge from perception through the process of concept formation and inductive and deductive logic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	What do you think?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Thank you.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>