https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/8.aspxDiscussion of political theory.enCommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/463039.aspxTue, 03 Apr 2012 17:56:22 GMT944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:463039No2statism0https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/463039.aspxhttps://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&PostID=463039<p> ^^^ Thanks:)</p><div style="clear:both;"></div>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/462993.aspxTue, 03 Apr 2012 08:57:33 GMT944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:462993Aristophanes0https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/462993.aspxhttps://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&PostID=462993<p> Not exactly.&nbsp; Wilson promoted international cooperation, multilateralism, and democracy.&nbsp; Some argue that the Bush doctrine is extreme Wilsonianism and some argue that Bush Jr. broke away from Wilsonianism with unilateral actions.&nbsp; So, he wasn&#39;t &quot;anti-nationalist&quot; as much as he was pro &#39;internationalist.&quot;&nbsp; There is some cross over, but there is enough od a difference to make distinguishments.&nbsp; You can read John Ickenberry for good disscussion on this issue.</p><div style="clear:both;"></div>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/462846.aspxMon, 02 Apr 2012 15:24:34 GMT944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:462846No2statism0https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/462846.aspxhttps://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&PostID=462846<p> Did he really support the end of the nation state?</p> <p> I haven&#39;t read a whole lot of his writings, but from what I&#39;ve read, it seems like he was very anti-nationalist, which is really the only contrast between his statism and that of Lincoln.</p><div style="clear:both;"></div>