<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Political Theory</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/8.aspx</link><description>Discussion of political theory.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Re: voluntary vs involuntary  consent for contract and crime</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/478130.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2012 06:02:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:478130</guid><dc:creator>John James</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/478130.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&amp;PostID=478130</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	Go back to the other thread on this, &lt;a href="http://mises.org/Community/forums/p/29894/477965.aspx#477965"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: voluntary vs involuntary  consent for contract and crime</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/478129.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2012 06:01:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:478129</guid><dc:creator>gotlucky</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/478129.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&amp;PostID=478129</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	You are legally liable for your actions in a voluntary society. It&amp;#39;s called strict unlimited liability. Of course, that doesn&amp;#39;t stop would be plaintiffs from forgiving you and not pressing charges. But you are liable for your actions. Always.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>voluntary vs involuntary  consent for contract and crime</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/478127.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2012 05:58:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:478127</guid><dc:creator>cab21</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/478127.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&amp;PostID=478127</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	perhaps this is answered to feel free to point me to any writings out there.
	
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	So what lengths will be gone to for insuring consent for contracts and crime in a ancap society? Is that up to any private law to make up and any private defense to make up conditions for which they will help enforce?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Just thinking about people saying a contract or crime&amp;nbsp;was invalid because a person was not in a state of mind where they could voluntarily consent to what actions they took. At what point are people responsible for their actions vs. get a defense for having a chemical imbalance or moment of involuntary behavior?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>