<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Political Theory</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/8.aspx</link><description>Discussion of political theory.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Re: Which policy sounds more statist to you?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/479235.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 22:20:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:479235</guid><dc:creator>Vitor</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/479235.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&amp;PostID=479235</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	Policy A reminds me of Singapore. Small state, not a lot of regulation, but the few they have are imposed quite rigorously.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Which policy sounds more statist to you?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/479231.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 21:25:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:479231</guid><dc:creator>cporter</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/479231.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&amp;PostID=479231</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	They are both equally statist. One may be more economically costly than the other, but that&amp;#39;s a different question entirely.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Which policy sounds more statist to you?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/479219.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 20:30:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:479219</guid><dc:creator>Rcder</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/479219.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&amp;PostID=479219</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	Oops, I misread the question!&amp;nbsp; Policy B is more statist.&amp;nbsp; My bad!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Which policy sounds more statist to you?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/479216.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 20:25:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:479216</guid><dc:creator>Bearchu.</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/479216.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&amp;PostID=479216</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	That makes it &lt;em&gt;more&lt;/em&gt; statist?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Which policy sounds more statist to you?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/479215.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 20:22:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:479215</guid><dc:creator>Rcder</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/479215.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&amp;PostID=479215</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	Policy A is definitely less statist.&amp;nbsp; Moreover, such a low level of tax receipts would result in the almost immediate bankruptcy of government; it&amp;#39;s hard to fund a warfare or welfare state on approximately $3 million annually.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Which policy sounds more statist to you?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/479210.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 19:31:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:479210</guid><dc:creator>Bearchu.</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/479210.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&amp;PostID=479210</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	Id say B. It would require more resources to keep track of who owed what percent, which would call for a larger state, making it more statist.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	A on the other hand would require a person and a means to execute, less resources, smaller state, less statist.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	ofcourse defining &amp;#39;statist&amp;#39; based on the size of the state and/or the amount of resources it requires.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Which policy sounds more statist to you?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/479208.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 18:59:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:479208</guid><dc:creator>cab21</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/479208.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&amp;PostID=479208</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	a. 1 cent one year, who knows what the rate will be next year? the increase could be attached to any unrelated bill&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Which policy sounds more statist to you?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/479207.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 18:54:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:479207</guid><dc:creator>Michelangelo</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/479207.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&amp;PostID=479207</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	Are we paying in government zinc pennies? Or copper pennies?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Policy B is more statist. It is easier for everyone to pay and avoid the penalty. Meanwhile Policy B will likely not be fulfilled by many, especially the poor. In terms of victims Policy B is more statist.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Which policy sounds more statist to you?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/479199.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 18:08:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:479199</guid><dc:creator>Aristophanes</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/479199.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&amp;PostID=479199</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	policy B is worse.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	You work much harder for the state in Policy B.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	One penny is less than one percent of one hour of work all year and what could the state do with only 300 million pennies per year?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Which policy sounds more statist to you?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/479198.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 18:08:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:479198</guid><dc:creator>vive la insurrection</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/479198.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&amp;PostID=479198</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	I don&amp;#39;tlike hypotheticals, but I&amp;#39;ll bite on this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Two ways to look at this:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	for myself I would prefer A,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	but could I make a social decision with such extreme consequences? &amp;nbsp;I would hope not. &amp;nbsp;Which may lead me to pick B&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Which policy sounds more statist to you?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/479197.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 17:48:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:479197</guid><dc:creator>Friedmanite</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/479197.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&amp;PostID=479197</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	Policy A: You must a pay a cent (a penny) to the government each year. &amp;nbsp;Failure to do so will result in your execution.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Policy B: You must pay 60 percent of your income to the government each year. &amp;nbsp;Failure to do so will result in your income tax going up by 5 percent the following year and possible jail time for not more than 6 months.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>