Political Theory

Re: $%@# My Law Professor Says

Willy Truth — Fri, 05 Oct 2012 19:24:16 GMT

I think people forget that communication is solely and only a copy function. Thinking as someone else said is a synthesis function, but eveyone in the room is making copies eithery by remembering what she said or by taking notes.

So what you're saying is...EVERYONE should go to jail for copyright infringement! As a self-interested future lawyer, I wholeheartedly agree! :P

Re: $%@# My Law Professor Says

cab21 — Tue, 04 Sep 2012 01:57:58 GMT

we can go to the left side of this and demand the government provide each person in the class with a audio, video, and transcript of the class. demand each class be open school.

Re: $%@# My Law Professor Says

Bert — Mon, 03 Sep 2012 15:42:31 GMT

Your professor sounds like a jackass. Besides I, Pencil, there's another really great piece by Leonard Read called The Free Market and It's Enemy that I feel also tackles IP, especially on the section Who Invented the Jet? To toot my own whistle, so to speak, here's something I wrote 2 years ago on thoughts and ideas sort of in the vein of I, Pencil.

Re: $%@# My Law Professor Says

David B — Mon, 03 Sep 2012 14:28:38 GMT

I think people forget that communication is solely and only a copy function. Thinking as someone else said is a synthesis function, but eveyone in the room is making copies eithery by remembering what she said or by taking notes.

The problem with brain to brain communication is one of fidelity. Where an audio recording can faithfully reproduce what she said, we can never be sure that the content of a mind that hears it matches precisely the content of the mind that said it.

Re: $%@# My Law Professor Says

John James — Mon, 03 Sep 2012 14:19:18 GMT

Willy Truth:
Does anyone have any real world analogies in this area to help me combat my Property professor?

Could you be more specific? Analogies for what exactly?

Also, from The Ultimate Beginner meta-thread:

Intellectual Property (IP) and innovation resources

Re: $%@# My Law Professor Says

cab21 — Wed, 29 Aug 2012 08:04:53 GMT

dont like her rule, don't take her class, now that would one way to combat in the free market.

are people not allowed to form contracts with others where there are rules and limitations or do people need to allow anything?

Re: $%@# My Law Professor Says

Willy Truth — Wed, 29 Aug 2012 05:44:07 GMT

Tell her she doesn't have a monopoly on a land of imagination and that her thoughts are not "created" by her, but instead they are "synthesized" by her. They are combinations of all of the other people's thoughts that she has come across and put preferences on. If she didn't own them, as the original authors presumably would, then her profiting off of them is illegal. And if you don't own her thoughts because you pay for the class, then she doesn't own her teachers thoughts and is profiting off of them. Education is void!!

Truth. I suppose this is the root of all Intellectual Property being BS.

Other than science and technology specific fields-- Which, although I want to, I still have trouble rationalizing why they're BS.

Does anyone have any real world analogies in this area to help me combat my Property professor?

Re: $%@# My Law Professor Says

John Ess — Wed, 29 Aug 2012 02:14:01 GMT

So she invented the American legal system?

Must be a genius woman.

Re: $%@# My Law Professor Says

alsdjfalsdjfos — Tue, 28 Aug 2012 23:21:14 GMT

I'm pretty sure that's a bullshit argument. You're free to record media for personal use. Otherwise they wouldn't let you buy VHS tapes.

Re: $%@# My Law Professor Says

eliotn — Tue, 28 Aug 2012 23:12:45 GMT

I think your professor might be afraid of being plagarized.

Re: $%@# My Law Professor Says

Aristophanes — Tue, 28 Aug 2012 23:11:36 GMT

It'd be funny if you secretly taped her and put the tapes out on bittorrent. "Share" her thoughts with others.

Tell her she doesn't have a monopoly on a land of imagination and that her thoughts are not "created" by her, but instead they are "synthesized" by her. They are combinations of all of the other people's thoughts that she has come across and put preferences on. If she didn't own them, as the original authors presumably would, then her profiting off of them is illegal. And if you don't own her thoughts because you pay for the class, then she doesn't own her teachers thoughts and is profiting off of them. Education is void!!

The difference in pirating and sharing is that pirating is taking other people's things, then profiting off of them. Sharing doesn't allow you to profit off of the distribution of others work.

$%@# My Law Professor Says

Willy Truth — Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:50:36 GMT

One of my law professors, on the first day of class, made a very interesting comment pertaining to IP. She said that she does not allow any voice recording technology in her class. When someone meekly asked why she has something against them, she responded, "Because my words and my thoughts are my Intellectual Property, and I don't want them reproduced or exploited without my consent." Well, her thoughts must be pretty damn valuable cause I'm paying out the ass for them, especially to not have full "ownership" of them.