Re: "Rights that aren't"

Wheylous — Fri, 21 Dec 2012 20:05:11 GMT

Did I forget my </shameless-plug? tag?

Silly me!

Re: "Rights that aren't"

Vitor — Fri, 21 Dec 2012 16:51:42 GMT

Pretty good text actually. Libertarianism in a nutshell

Re: "Rights that aren't"

NonAntiAnarchist — Fri, 21 Dec 2012 08:37:47 GMT

It seems like this article is all the rage on the internet. You should really check it out so that you don't fall behind on the coolest trends.

Lol

"Rights that aren't"

Wheylous — Fri, 21 Dec 2012 06:18:46 GMT

Rights That Aren’t

Or, “why a misformulation of Constitutional rights has restricted, rather than liberated, the natural rights of man”

Initially, the Founders formulated to Constitution not to delineate the rights of the individual, but to restrict the powers of government. Soon thereafter, it was decided that the Constitution indeed needed to list some individual rights, so greedy was government for power. Hence, the Bill of Rights promised the American public a certain set of rights. Unfortunately, this was a hodge-podge solution that failed to address the fundamental reasons behind those rights – the right to your body and property [1]. Moreover, the misunderstanding of these rights has led to supposedly pro-liberty people taking on some very strange positions. I address a few of these rights here and hope the reader can apply the logic elsewhere.

It seems like this article is all the rage on the internet. You should really check it out so that you don't fall behind on the coolest trends.

Political Theory

Re: "Rights that aren't"

Re: "Rights that aren't"

Re: "Rights that aren't"

"Rights that aren't"

Rights That Aren’t