<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Political Theory</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/8.aspx</link><description>Discussion of political theory.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Critic culture and the nature of power and institutional tensions</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/516014.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2013 08:24:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:516014</guid><dc:creator>vive la insurrection</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/516014.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&amp;PostID=516014</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
	The mere fact that people can organize and influence people under phenomena like socialism, X culture,(blank)ism, or whatever ought to be&amp;nbsp;a fundamental&amp;nbsp;aknowledgment when thinking about any&amp;nbsp;social theory.&amp;nbsp; The fact &lt;em&gt;that it is&lt;/em&gt; (as a phenomena, fashion, custom,&amp;nbsp;or whatever) is what is important and an Austrian minded thinker should never lose sight of this.&amp;nbsp; Expectations and institutions have to be taken more seriously to get&amp;nbsp;a fuller and more robust view of an economic picture.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	There is a very good tradition of this sort well within the Austrian framework: Menger, Weber, Schutz (maybe, I never read him), Wiser, and Lachmann all saw this as a critical aspect to social theory - and I think Hayek and Mises writings on intellectuals may actually point in this direction &amp;nbsp;when examined while illustrating&amp;nbsp; the methodological individualistic aspects of praxeology and it&amp;#39;s relationship to institutions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>