https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/8.aspxDiscussion of political theory.enCommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/57186.aspxThu, 09 Oct 2008 01:29:13 GMT944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:57186Jon Irenicus0https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/57186.aspxhttps://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&PostID=57186<p>No, St Thomas tries as much as possible to base his arguments on reason, but IIRC he advocates natural law and not so much natural rights.</p> <p>-Jon</p><div style="clear:both;"></div>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/57167.aspxWed, 08 Oct 2008 23:45:01 GMT944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:57167Solid_Choke0https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/57167.aspxhttps://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&PostID=57167<p><blockquote><div><img src="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/Themes/mises2008/images/icon-quote.gif"> <strong>krazy kaju:</strong></div><div></p> <p>What about Thomistic ideology? Does it differ significantly from Aristotelianism or is it simply a &quot;Christian reincarnation&quot; of the same ideas?</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div> <p></div></blockquote></p> <p>It is a commonly understood that Augustine christianized Plato in a similar way that Aquinas christianized Aristotle.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p><div style="clear:both;"></div>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/57161.aspxWed, 08 Oct 2008 23:35:06 GMT944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:57161krazy kaju0https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/57161.aspxhttps://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&PostID=57161<p>What about Thomistic ideology? Does it differ significantly from Aristotelianism or is it simply a &quot;Christian reincarnation&quot; of the same ideas?</p><div style="clear:both;"></div>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/56558.aspxTue, 07 Oct 2008 02:12:44 GMT944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:56558Jon Irenicus0https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/56558.aspxhttps://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&PostID=56558<p>NR is not strictly deontological. Locke&#39;s system is one non-Aristotelian form of NR. Nozick&#39;s yet another.</p> <p>-Jon</p><div style="clear:both;"></div>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/56494.aspxMon, 06 Oct 2008 21:18:37 GMT944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:56494hayekianxyz0https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/56494.aspxhttps://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&PostID=56494<p>As I understand it there are more approaches to natural rights than Aristotle&#39;s human flourishing, which as I understand it isn&#39;t strictly deontological. Yet what other approaches to NR are there other than this? </p> <p>Also what other forms of deontological ethics other than NR, are there any other than Kantianism?</p><div style="clear:both;"></div>