<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Political Theory</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/8.aspx</link><description>Discussion of political theory.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Re: Arthur Schopenhauer once said,</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/64856.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 06:36:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:64856</guid><dc:creator>Jon Irenicus</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/64856.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&amp;PostID=64856</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;From the Wiki article on him, he sounded like a minarchist-monarchist. He was the master of cynics though. He has some very funny quotes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-Jon&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Arthur Schopenhauer once said,</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/64855.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 06:35:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:64855</guid><dc:creator>fezwhatley</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/64855.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&amp;PostID=64855</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I am a big fan of Schopenhauer, that&amp;#39;s why his quote caught my eye so much, for a man as bright as him i thought his politics was a little disappointing. Then again he was generally apolitical&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Arthur Schopenhauer once said,</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/64842.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 05:57:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:64842</guid><dc:creator>nameless</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/64842.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&amp;PostID=64842</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;img src="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/Themes/mises2008/images/icon-quote.gif"&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Marko:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I wouldn`t bother myself with the words of a man who considered himself to be a rat all that much. He was obviously a bit bonkers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;haha maybe he was literal when he said that he preferred to be ruled by a lion.&amp;nbsp; In which case I would agree that being under the rule of a lion would be preferable to any system of government that man has tried.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Arthur Schopenhauer once said,</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/64829.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 05:16:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:64829</guid><dc:creator>John Ess</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/64829.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&amp;PostID=64829</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Schopenhauer was very non-political and was infamous for his attacks on Hegel&amp;#39;s warming up to the church/state duo.&amp;nbsp; None of what I&amp;#39;ve read shows any coherent acceptance of government.&amp;nbsp; Mostly he finds kings and all other systems to be terrible too.&amp;nbsp; He sort of takes pride in ignoring politics -- which is refreshing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is a great line, though, by Schopenhauer that kind of explains his ambivalence (democracy and monarchy are both contra to nature).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From Counsels and Maxims:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;&amp;quot;What are States and all the elaborate systems of political&lt;br /&gt;machinery, and the rule of force, whether in home or in foreign&lt;br /&gt;affairs,--what are they but barriers against the boundless iniquity&lt;br /&gt;of mankind? Does not all history show that whenever a king is firmly&lt;br /&gt;planted on a throne, and his people reach some degree of prosperity,&lt;br /&gt;he uses it to lead his army, like a band of robbers, against adjoining&lt;br /&gt;countries? Are not almost all wars ultimately undertaken for purposes&lt;br /&gt;of plunder? In the most remote antiquity, and to some extent also in&lt;br /&gt;the Middle Ages, the conquered became slaves,--in other words, they&lt;br /&gt;had to work for those who conquered them; and where is the difference&lt;br /&gt;between that and paying war-taxes, which represent the product of our&lt;br /&gt;previous work?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;All war, says Voltaire, is a matter of robbery; and the Germans should&lt;br /&gt;take that as a warning.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Arthur Schopenhauer once said,</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/64815.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:31:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:64815</guid><dc:creator>Marko</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/64815.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&amp;PostID=64815</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I wouldn`t bother myself with the words of a man who considered himself to be a rat all that much. He was obviously a bit bonkers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Arthur Schopenhauer once said,</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/64795.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 02:53:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:64795</guid><dc:creator>hayekianxyz</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/64795.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&amp;PostID=64795</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;http://www.lewrockwell.com/hoppe/hoppe4.html&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Arthur Schopenhauer once said,</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/64789.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 02:30:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:64789</guid><dc:creator>fezwhatley</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/64789.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&amp;PostID=64789</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;he would &amp;quot;prefer to be ruled by a lion than one of his fellow rats&amp;quot;, essentially endorsing monarchy.&amp;nbsp; But this begs the question, why is being ruled by a lion preferable over being ruled by rats?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>