<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Political Theory</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/8.aspx</link><description>Discussion of political theory.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Re: Is a consistent theonomist necessarily opposed to separation of church and state?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/75771.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 22:35:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:75771</guid><dc:creator>Individualist</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/75771.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&amp;PostID=75771</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;More information: He said that abortion isn&amp;#39;t murder, but he doesn&amp;#39;t think abortion is right for&amp;nbsp;women who have conceived&amp;nbsp;&amp;quot;illegitimate&amp;quot; chilren. That either makes him pro-choice or theonomistic on the issue.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Is a consistent theonomist necessarily opposed to separation of church and state?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/75755.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 21:49:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:75755</guid><dc:creator>krazy kaju</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/75755.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&amp;PostID=75755</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m not really sure about the Bible, but I do know that the foundational documents of Calvinism call for a civil government entertwined with religion. Make of it what you will.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Is a consistent theonomist necessarily opposed to separation of church and state?</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/75749.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 21:39:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">944abf2b-d1be-4bf2-990d-438cb0e377e9:75749</guid><dc:creator>Individualist</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/thread/75749.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=8&amp;PostID=75749</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I know someone who I&amp;nbsp;think may be a theonomist, though he supports the separation of church and state (I believe). Would a consistent theonomist oppose the separation of church and state?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>