Whatever term comes into common usage (at least, common to "us") there's probably going to be explaining to do no matter what.
I will stick with 'libertarian' until leftists give 'liberalism' back to us.
Chyd3nius, miksi kutsut itseäsi, kun olet tekemisissä suomalaisten kanssa?
I thought things a bit and decided to point to my first post...
Or 'jewish'. Murray Rothbard invented anarcho-capitalism and was a jew, and Mises was too. And I heard that Gary North proved that the Old Testament is quite pro-market. No one certainly don't want to be an anti-semitist!
Maybe we actually should start to talk about "jewish economy"! Think about all the Hitler-cards!
Riippuu aika lailla tilanteesta, käytän "klassista liberaalia" kun en halua leimautua liian radikaaliksi, ja "anarkokapitalistia" kun haluan. "Kannatan vapaata markkinataloutta" on kuitenkin yleensä ymmärretty helpoiten. Kaikesta huolimatta ihmisillä on ennakkoluuloja, eivätkä he useinkaan käsitä että inhoan mm. Kokoomusta ja EU:ta.
Today's Mises Daily:
Why Capitalism Is Worth Defending (by Anthony Gregory)
http://mises.org/daily/5505/Why-Capitalism-Is-Worth-Defending
If you substitute the term, "libertarian purists" for "anarcho-capitalists" and "libertarian purism" for "anarcho-capitalism," you accomplish the following:
1) You more accurately describe Rothbardian, Freedmanite, and Kosankeist principles in terms that are familiar to many,
2) You solidify the relationship between libertarianism and a truly free market while demonstrating that minarchist libertarianism is incomplete.
3) You expand visibility for the movement.
Try it out. I am confident that you will be satisfied with the results.
John Frederic Kosanke - Author of "Instead of Politics: (Principles of Civilization)"
Why Capitalism Is Worth Defending (by Anthony Gregory) http://mises.org/daily/5505/Why-Capitalism-Is-Worth-Defending
I still like the jewish one.