<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>msun641's Comments</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/members/msun641/default.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Advice</title><link>https://archive.freecapitalists.org:443/members/msun641/comments/default.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 20:47:29 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Jakem</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m posting a response to your question here so I don&amp;#39;t start a flame war. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I was in the same boat as you a few months ago. I became interested in economics through the Mises Institute and considered myself a Rothbardian but I&amp;#39;ve changed my mind recently. As I learned more about mainstream economics, I realized that most of the important Austrian insights had been taken up as part of neoclassical thinking. Austrian economics isn&amp;#39;t coming back because there is really no such thing as Austrian economics anymore. Mises and Hayek are great thinkers and I would recommend their writings to anyone but there is more out there. I wouldn&amp;#39;t get too hung up on the fact that people don&amp;#39;t use the same terms Mises used, for example.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Good luck in school.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>