-
Firstly, we're not talking about forests; we are talking about people, and as such, the question that should be asked is either "how will the government protect those with conditions that private insurance will not cover?" or "how will the free-market do so". If charity is the only means by which vulnerable people can be protected
-
Btw, I got almost 10 million results from google. Not sure what's going on at your end of the interspace.
-
How will the free-market provide for those that do have pre-existing conditions? Charity and nothing more?
-
"With respect to this question, for me, there isn't any meaningful difference between forcing a man to work and then robbing him of his product, and allowing a man to work and then robbing him of his product." The difference is that the former action is an NAP violation of two types: firstly, there is the removal of the slave's choice