-
[quote user="vive la insurrection"] He's Just Not That Into You: The No Excuse Truth To Understanding Guys : Liz Tuccilo and Greg Behrendt [/quote] Maybe it's just me, but I did not see that one coming.
-
hashem, At one point or another, Mises has addressed most, if not all, of your points. If you don't want to read Human Action, Theory and History is a concise book that explains a lot of Mises' views on methodology. Even reading just the introduction will answer many of your questions, though reading the entire book will give you a more in depth
-
@vive I can assure you that I did read Conza's post to me, and that Hoppe quote has nothing to do with what I said about Rothbard and Mises. We're all just monkeys typing well structured sentences at each other, but unfortunately they are not related. @Conza My point about Rothbard is only that a lot of his politics isn't relevant to an
-
In addition to Human Action, I recommend the introduction to Theory and History.
-
I can access it.
-
So let me get this straight. If we assume enough false premises to be true, we could eventually justify a political theory? What a big win for Marxists...
-
Maybe this will help. From what you said: [quote user="limitgov"] You can tell the UFC fans that free market judges would at least have to answer to the market/consumer demand, but the government judges don't have to answer to anyone. But the UFC fans don't seem to care. They believe, if the judging was in the hands of the free market
-
My introduction to the Austrian school was through Bastiat (I don't know if that seems strange, but it was through Bastiat that I found AE, and I found Bastiat through John Stossel and Walter Williams), and my introduction to anarcho-capitalism was through Rothbard. Rothbard makes a lot of sense overall, so I was definitely into his political theories
-
On wage slavery: A complete rebuttal
-
[quote] I am almost certainly not a "Rothbardian-Misean" in the way people of Mises.org are, and I think this post just declared that fact. While I obviously started with Mises.org type of reading for heterodox economics, even early on I noticed certain tensions in my thought (chiefly on the nature of applications of subjectivity, determinism