atrickpay

Pro-private property, pro-natural rights, Articles of Confederation>Constitution, anti minimal-statism.
What's with the hostility towards collectivism? Some instances of it are perfectly fine...

Definition of collective: a grouping of individuals.

Definition of collectivism: having to do with a collective.

 

Conclusion

1. Voluntary collectivism is fine. E.g. being part of a baseball team, joining a hippie-commune, etc.

2. The initiation of coercive collectivism is not OK. E.g. being bound by physical force (or threat thereof) to:

a) join a street-gang; b) fund a government national defense force; etc.

3. Coercive collectivism is OK if used in self-defense. E.g. a group of individuals use physical force to subdue a violent thug.

 

Remember, precision with terms is very important.

In defense of fractional-reserve banking

A lot of pro-liberty people think that fractional-reserve banking is a nefarious thing that should be made illegal.

Why do they think this? Because:

  • 1. They believe that it is inherently fraudulent.
  • 2. It increases the money supply and thus decreases the value of the money (assuming of course that the demand for money has not increased to match the increased supply).

I will address both of these points:

  • 1. It is not true that it is inherently fraudulent. This example proves it:

-I go the bank to make a deposit and specifically request that they keep only a fraction of it on reserve.

-I also stipulate that I want to be able to withdraw a sum equivalent to what I put in at any time.

So, as long as both parties consent to it being done, how can it be considered fraud?

 

  • 2. They are correct here that it does decrease the value of the money (with the assumption I noted above).

However, they are not justified in using physical force (ie. making it illegal) to stop me from decreasing the value of the money via my engaging in a fractional-reserve deposit. Why?

Because you don't have a natural right to the value of your property. You only have a right to the property itself. For example, say my house declined in price from $200,000 to $150,000. I do not have a right to apply coercion on my neighbor to make him buy it at its previous price of $200,000.

 

Conclusion

Thus, both of their objections do not give sufficient justification to make it illegal. Long live fractional-reserve banking!