I'm not impressed with the reasons the interviewees provided, but nonetheless, this could be a major blow to IP should the SCOTUS do the right thing.
I won't hold my breath.
I wonder what the implications would be if someone's genetic code has genes patented by someone else?
I thought that someone already patented the human genome...
Interesting, we're watching the reductio ad absurdum against IP being played out in real life. The scary thing is: what if they don't find the logical conclusion of IP to be absurd?