My chat program (yahelite) automatically keeps a transcript of every chat session. I was scrolling through and found this one. I took out all of the banter and peanut gallery comments from the other chatters. What's left is the unedited comments by me (Fred), this guy named durtyoldman and later some remarks from a chick named nobiwan.This chat transcript perfectly illustrates why it is a futile and stupid waste of time to debate liberty online.Let me set it up a litte: this bozo (durty) was explaining to someone that inflation is caused by several factors, chief among these being unemployment. I tried to explain to him that it is only an increase in the money supply that causes inflation. I tried doing this by way of analogy, though as I said later in the transcript, I assumed that he was smarter than he really was. I should have been more clear from the start. I was talking about an island whereupon about 100 people lived where gold was the medium of exchange. Obviously, this is a post-barter economy. I created a scenario where the money supply doubled overnight. I then asked the idiot to comment on what he thought would happen to the price of a cow if the cow was worth 200 oz of gold the day before the money supply doubled. Obviously, the answer is that the new price of a cow would be 400 oz.At first, I thought he was (not so) cleverly evading, so that he wouldn't have to deal with losing this debate, but as time went on, I realized that he really is this stupid. Here is the transcript:
-------------
Fred: durtyolman58 you don't have a clue in hell what causes inflation, do you? )durtyolman58: fred, yeah high unemployment is a rip time for inflation lolFred: durtyolman58 inflation has one single cause: inflation of the money supplydurtyolman58: fred, another bullshit deinitionFred: durtyolman58 it's a proven factdurtyolman58: inflation can have many causesFred: no, it can'tFred: it can only have one causeFred: it's well knowndurtyolman58: lolFred: durtyolman58 as I said, you clearly haven't read up on any of this stuffFred: you and I both know itFred: almost your every post betrays and utter lack of knowledge of economicsFred: you have never read even an article on economics, much less a bookdurtyolman58: fred, I read up on it before the libertairian retards redined thinsg to fit their beliefsFred: durtyolman58 I can't tell you too many more times that I am not a libertarianFred: maybe once or twice moredurtyolman58: fred, as you claim, but yoru arguments abotu economics are straight from their propogandaFred: durtyolman58 I haven't met too many libertarians who know much about economics at allFred: including the Libertarian Party's last two presidential candidatesdurtyolman58: fredm I agree they are cluless about it, and you make teh same argumnts they makeFred: no, I have studied thisFred: you and I both know itFred: and you and I both know that you have notFred: durtyolman58 I would be willing to bet that you haven't read more than 3 articles about economics in your entire lifedurtyolman58: fred, that's liek a guy claiming he studied biology and stating evolution never happensFred: and zero economics booksdurtyolman58: inflation is a result of an imbalance in supply and demandFred: durtyolman58 no it isn'tdurtyolman58: right it isn't lolFred: an inbalance in supply and demand will cause the prices for that service or commodity to rise, but not for prices to rise in the economy in generalFred: which is the definition of inflationdurtyolman58: you can hav inflation because manufactireres aren't creating consumer goods and rare consumer goods would result in inflated pricesFred: durtyolman58 UNLESS you are talking about the supply and demand of MONEYFred: then I would agree with youdurtyolman58: or teh could be a huge demand, causing an inflation of prices as wellFred: durtyolman58 no, that just causes an increase in prices in those specific industriesFred: not the economy as a wholeFred: see, you haven't read any of this stuffFred: hahaFred: you and I both know itdurtyolman58: and to talk of money supply increases when so man laons are being dfeaulted on, and the value of thinsg securing those loans ar plummeting, is illogicalFred: durtyolman58 you very clearly don't know what you are talking aboutdurtyolman58: the money supply is booming, aig lost 5 billion dollars lolFred: durtyolman58 I am frankly amazed that you would continue to pretend to speak authoritatively on a subject you know so little aboutdurtyolman58: as if that lost money can be foudn under a rock, or wasn't borrowed from othersdurtyolman58: idiots who talk of an increased money supply in these times are just idiots, who read a book, but didn't understand anythingdurtyolman58: idealoguesFred: durtyolman58 so if you, me and 100 or so people lived on an isolated island, and there was 1000 oz of gold on that islandFred: and a cow was worht 200 ozFred: and then a ship wrecked on that island and we found an extra 1000 oz of goldFred: and it circulated through the economydurtyolman58: fred, we aren't talking of an isoloated island here, it si world economyFred: what would the price of a cow THEN be?Fred: durtyolman58 irrelevantFred: just answer the questionFred: what would the price of a cow THEN be?durtyolman58: fred, there is no answer, I have all the gold and I don't want the cow, so the value of teh cow is 0Fred: after a doubling of the money supplyFred: durtyolman58 nice evasionFred: the price of the cow would be 400 ozdurtyolman58: fred, again, how can you double teh money supply unde todays conditoinsFred: durtyolman58 through the federal reserveFred: in fact, in the last 9 years, the fed has created more US dollars than have ever existed in the aggregated preceeding yearsFred: durtyolman58 it is stunning that you hold such strong opinions on a topic you have so little understanding ofdurtyolman58: fred especially that braon dead island with a cow and gold analogyFred: durtyolman60 funny that, since it is taught in econ classes worldwideFred: that is exactly how econ profs teach inflationFred: exactly how I did with the island exampledurtyolman60: fred, on that island, the gold has 0 value, only the cow has valueFred: wrongFred: it presumes that gold is the medium of exchangeFred: I could have said nailsdurtyolman60: fred, an example of the assumptions at teh root of your errors with regard to economic theorydurtyolman60: fred, the only thing of value on that island would be teh cowFred: durtyolman60 explain then why econ profs use that exact example when they teach inflation?Fred: durtyolman60 you are wrongdurtyolman60: fred, ebcause they are assholesdurtyolman60: fred, the type of assholes whose ideas got us in this bindFred: durtyolman60 it presumes a society, like so many throughout history, wherein gold, or silver, or nails, or pearls, are the unit of exchangeFred: durtyolman60 you are so goddamned dumb it's no longer funnydurtyolman60: fred, yeah presumes, but on a desreted island with only males and a cow, the gold is wrothless, unless soem oen has a strong yen for shiniesFred: durtyolman60 that's not the presumptiondurtyolman60: fred, what was dumb is taking that abalogy ast face value, and not looking at it to see what the things of value on that island wereFred: durtyolman60 you can't refute the metaphor by changing itdurtyolman60: fred, it was a prssumption that gold would have value to teh guy who owne the cowFred: durtyolman60 no, the island example is a gold based economyFred: you just can't refute it, so you changed itdurtyolman60: as if money sat idele, the use of money the appearance of money is due to it's ciculationdurtyolman60: stagnant money is wrthlessFred: durtyolman60 the island example is an economy wherein gold is a currencyFred: I could have used chickensFred: nailsdurtyolman60: fred, what mad it a gold based eceonomy? why would anyoen want gold?Fred: or anythingFred: durtyolman60 because gold has independently arisen as money worldwideFred: durtyolman60 you can't address the analogydurtyolman60: fred, you create a improbable fantasy and claim it proves a point, when you can't justify why gold would have value within itdurtyolman60: fred, it was brainlessFred: durtyolman60 not an improbable fantasy: historically accurateFred: it has happened millions of times throughout historyFred: durtyolman60 in Scotland, nails were used as currencydurtyolman60: fred, historical my ass, gold hasd never had value in an isolated non comercial regionnobiwan911: Are you guys seriously arguing over why gold is valuable?Fred: cows were valued in numbers of nailsnobiwan911: Gold is valuable because it is a scarce resource with alternative uses. Fred: durtyolman60 you dumb son of a bitch: in any economy that evolves past bartering SOMETHING arises as the main commodity of exchangeFred: maybe it's gold, silver, eggs, nails, wool, whiskeyFred: it doesn't matter what it isnobiwan911: Barter is inefficient, hence we invent currency. durtyolman60: gold has NO intrisic value, the only value it has is as a raw meterial in making thingsFred: exactly nobiwan911Fred: nothing has intrinsic valuedurtyolman60: soem non comercial society without metal workers, would place no value of boldFred: durtyolman60 it doesn't matter what5 the medium of exchange isFred: it doesn't matterFred: you really cannot be this fucking stupidFred: reallydurtyolman60: fred, the only medium of excanhe in your example was teh cow itself and the milk it producedFred: durtyolman60 let's say that the commodity of exchange is nails, as it was in Scotland prior to the english taking overFred: ok?Fred: durtyolman60 let's say that the commodity of exchange is nails, as it was in Scotland prior to the english taking overdurtyolman60: and if it was my cow and you anted the milk, any god nuggets you had would be garbage, go clear the broken sea shells from the beacj so I don't hurt my toes when I go swimming if you wantdurtyolman60: soem milkFred: ok?Fred: so it's nailsFred: agree?durtyolman60: fred, stop inventing currencu\iesFred: I am not inventing shitFred: nails were used as currency in ancient scotlanddurtyolman60: nails are as useless to me as gold, without timberFred: durtyolman60 ok, we are talking about a post barter economy, ok?durtyolman60: they had axes and forests to get timberFred: in ALL post barter economies, SOMETHING arises as the main commodity of exchangeFred: do you at least agree with that?durtyolman60: godl has no use to a hungry man where there is no one to buy food ffromFred: in ancient scotland, nails were the commodity of exchangedurtyolman60: if I alrady controlled the food supply, I don't need your gold or your nailsFred: durtyolman60 you are ignoring historyFred: what I am talking about is historicalFred: your retorts are notFred: that's the differenceFred: and what you are doing is short circuiting any debatedurtyolman60: fred, you create dthe anology, now froma desreted isolated island, it is one with a big economy, but only 1 cow lolFred: so that you won't have to deal with the fact that, in the end, I winFred: durtyolman60 no, I didn't create this analogyFred: it's taught in econ 101Fred: worldwidedurtyolman60: marplost, only if there are metal workers around with the tools to smelt and shape itnobiwan911: Fred: That's why I know it. I took an econ class. Fred: I never said there was only one cowdurtyolman60: fred, right you just quoted it lolFred: thank you nobiwan911durtyolman60: lingiustics again, zetardismnobiwan911: I only took one, though. Heh. Fred: durtyolman60 what I am talking about is historicalFred: what you are talking about is notdurtyolman60: fred, what you were talking about is what some asshoel told you ina class room, and you bought itFred: no, I am talking about PhD economistsnobiwan911: Durty: Every single intro to economics class. durtyolman60: lol frednobiwan911: Durty: Kind of like how evolution is taught in biology. Fred: durtyolman60 I have two econ textbooks right hereFred: and both of them contain at least one of the two examples I mentioneddurtyolman60: phd's are teh peopel who crashed our economy, using assumptions sich ass I've seen you use, regarding teh value of land, and which you used just now regarding the value of gold in adurtyolman60: limited environmentnobiwan911: Fred: Seashells and cigarettes are the ones I was given. Fred: I even have Krugman's macro and micro books around here, and I wouldn't be surprised if they had either one or both tooFred: nobiwan911 have you read the study of the German prison camp economy?durtyolman60: fred, bih shit, the economists you rea have been proved wrong by recent eventsnobiwan911: Fred: No, but that sounds fascinating.Fred: it proved, undeniably, nearly every claim of neo-classical microFred: durtyolman60 the economists I read predicted the current eventsFred: that is exactly why I read themdurtyolman60: fred, raw gold had value in the prison camps?Fred: no, cigarettes didnobiwan911: Fred: I was given the phenomena of cigarettes as currency in the prison population here in the US.durtyolman60: lol fredFred: they were used as a medium of exchangedurtyolman60: I've seen you post abotu how real estate will always go upFred: durtyolman60 never once have I ever said that real estate will always go upFred: not oncedurtyolman60: cigs had value, because peopel wanted them, so what?Fred: you are either confused or lyingdurtyolman60: on that island, the only thing of value was teh cow, and what the owner of teh coe wanteddurtyolman60: the value of teh cigs was that soem peopel wanted to smoke them, jeeseFred: durtyolman60 no, stupid: I already told you the island is a post-barter economy using SOMETHING as a commodity of exchangedurtyolman60: fred, cnaging your definition of teh island now loldurtyolman60: post barter, instead of isolated and populated by just a few men with 1 cowFred: durtyolman60 I started this conversation out assuming that you would be smart enough to figure that outFred: I over estimated youFred: durtyolman60 I said about 100 people, including me and youFred: I said that right from the startFred: and a post-barter economy can be isolatedFred: or notdurtyolman60: fred, no your analogy was pure assumption, assuming the onlything the peopel would want with teh gold they found was the cow, and that the owner of teh cow wanted golddurtyolman60: in this now post barter islandFred: durtyolman60 no, it assumes, like so many times in history, that gold would be a medium of exchangeFred: it doesn't matter what the commodity isdurtyolman60: fred, if there are a 100 cows and only 10 men wanting 1, the price of a cow is cheapFred: durtyolman60 so?Fred: durtyolman60 but a surplus of cows wouldn't drive up the cost of everything in the economydurtyolman60: so it would not efefct the value of a cow, no matter how much gold was tehreFred: inflation is an increase in all prices in an economyFred: yes it would, if the money supply increased or decreaseddurtyolman60: inflation is not an increase in all prices, unless it is tied to a devaluation of teh currencey, and this is only one type of inflationFred: inflation is an increase in all prices in an economyFred: that is the definition of inflationFred: nobiwan911 did you learn that inflation was a general increase in prices in an economy?durtyolman60: so fred, we are back to tyour linguistic use of one of teh possible definitions of infaltion, in otehr words, a zeradismFred: and not an increase in a few or one commoditynobiwan911: Fred: Yep. Fred: durtyolman60 you are incredibly stupidFred: literally incrediblydurtyolman60: fred, you are incredibly denseFred: as in: I literally cannot believe how stupid you areFred: durtyolman60 nobiwan911 just took an econ class and she has been consistently agreeing with menobiwan911: I took it four years ago. nobiwan911: Got a B.Fred: ok :pFred: 4 years agonobiwan911: It was hard. Fred: yeah, it's a hard subjectnobiwan911: The second time I took something even vaguely resembling an econ class was last fall. Global political economy. Which then proceeded to collapse. durtyolman60: neo economic tehory has been dumbed down, that basis for reagn's trickle down bullshitnobiwan911: So, I'm not taking any more econ classes. Fred: durtyolman60 you are breathtakingly stupidFred: durtyolman60 why is it that nobiwan911 took an econ class and has consistently agreed with everything I have yet said?Fred: nobiwan911 does this sound familiar: MV = PQnobiwan911: Fred: I need you to understand right now that I'm a liberal arts major. I took statistics to fulfill the math requirement. nobiwan911: I hate math. Fred: where M equals the money supply, V the velocity of money (pretty much constant)nobiwan911: Money has velocity?Fred: oh darn, I was hoping you remembered the other twoFred: hahaFred: yeahnobiwan911: Price and somethingFred: I'll google itFred: P is the general price levelFred: and Q is an index of the real value of final expenditures;Fred: meaning, even theoretically (nevermind what history teaches) inflation is caused by an increase in the supply of money
Read my Nolan Chart column "Me & My Big Mouth"
*Collapses on the ground gasping for beer after reading that screed*
Base model cars of the world unite! You have nothing to lose but quarter-mile races.
I really don't know what is so difficult about the concept of inflation:-Government increases the money supply (inflation)-Certain groups benefit from the 'new' money, redistributing wealth-As the money makes it's way through the economy the purchasing power of it drops....- ...and prices rise (price inflation)
I read about the first 20 lines. Fred, inflation is the expansion of the money supply. A symptom of inflation may be higher prices. You were saying that inflation causes inflation.
To paraphrase Marc Faber: We're all doomed, but that doesn't mean that we can't make money in the process. Rabbi Lapin: "Let's make bricks!" Stephan Kinsella: "Say you and I both want to make a German chocolate cake."
Well, I was going by the modern definition of inflation, which says that inflation is a general rise in prices throughout an economy. I started to mention to this blockhead that, in the old days, common dictionaries defined inflation as an increase in the supply of money.
I made it very, very clear thoughout this exchange, that inflation (of prices throughout an economy -- in other words, the modern, common definition) is caused by an increase in the money supply.
I like to use "inflation of the money supply" and "price inflation" to make my arguement clearer. Btw, the other guy never (or at least up until about line 20) attempted to properly refute anything you said. I hate these types of arguements where one side spews ad hominems, etc. Oh noes! A libertarian!!!! lol