-
Why do you have so many problems? What do you know about my problems? I'm just telling you that you make A LOT of stupid threads.
-
There is nothing to take.... only to use your own property to make a copy of other person's property. protip: Let dumb threads die.
-
You're welcome. If there is anything else to do I'm sure we'll help. GL
-
Yeah, I'm psychic. http://blog.mises.org/13277/the-l-neil-smith-freetalklive-copyright-dispute/
-
[quote user="Angurse"]Sure .[/quote] They are both basically the same thing, a person willing a certain state of affairs to obtain. There is a social aspect of any contract, but within it is the same individual act of willing given into illocutionary force by forming agreement. Dad makes a promise to submit to any punishment from a certain
-
I never understood the thing "always preferring more to less". An obvious counter-example: I prefer less sickness to more. I wrote about this recently but forgot about the thread . See #4 from this part of Mises' Theory and History . Sometimes the utterance of a judgment of value is elliptical and makes sense only if appropriately completed
-
[quote user="Jesse"]He is more consistent in his application of the labor theory of value than the classical school was.[/quote] 1/0=2/0 your point?
-
"Those are really poor and completely invalid arguments WillBlake." Awesome quote, I agree with it 100%.
-
Damn this board moves quickly, has anybody finished reading it yet? It isn't free online, so maybe I will check it out next year when it is available.
-
You're right on "subsidiary". I have no clue why I even used that word. I think people usually call those "supporting axioms". "Subsidiary" implies some sort of dependence (different than "being deduced from", which doesn't make sense). There is some information on this stuff, I just can't find it