Epistemology in History

This post is the first in a series on the History of Epistemological Thought

Assertions and arguments regarding particular topics (for example, ethics, economics, physics, etc) all rest on an epistemology (whether explicitly or implicitly): that is, a theory of knowledge, truth, and falsity.  Therefore, the first task of a thorough scholar is to make the case for his own epistemology.  In a series of posts that will follow, I will work towards doing that.  But I will do so in a roundabout way: through writing a brief history of epistemological thought.  I will cover the most prominent schools of epistemology and their foremost thinkers: evaluating their doctrines as I go, and picking out the choicest bits to construct my own epistemology.

Next in this series: Epistemology in (Western) History: From Hesiod to Hoppe

Filed under:

Comments

# wilderness said:

So principles providing a knowledge base, those principles are epistemological?

Monday, June 8, 2009 1:45 PM
# Daniel James Sanchez said:

Yes, I believe that statement is sound.

Monday, June 8, 2009 3:24 PM
# wilderness said:

Thank you very much

Wednesday, June 10, 2009 6:46 PM