A View from the Trenches, November 18th, 2009: "Update on latest market themes"
Please, click here to read this article in pdf format: www.sibileau.com
Perhaps yesterday was an opportunity to take a break and think
matters over more carefully. Although equities closed almost flat in
the US, there was some intraday volatility. The underperformance in
mortgage-backed securities (some overseas trading at 7am ET exactly)
caught my attention, as it would not be the first time that such
overseas/overnight trading sets the stage for the day or week…
There are a few themes (not thesis) being discussed lately, that I think may anticipate a tough 2010:
-Global Imbalances, the USD and rates:
This issue has been on the table for decades already. It has gained
more airtime with Obama’s recent visit to China and Bernanke’s comments
at the Economic Club of New York. The short summary of its 2009/10
version is something like this: China’s monetary policy of fixed
exchange rates has forced the Bank of China to buy the dollars the Fed
has been issuing. Some analysts (see Bank of America’s “Situation
Report” of November 16th) call this”China’s vendor financing”. I think
the term is spot on. When the Bank of China buys dollars, it issues
Renmimbis, which have been used to buy local assets, among which real
estate has a prominent place.
While China worries about the USD devaluation, the other side of the
coin is that if the US was to stop what I am now convinced is an
intentional devaluation, it would only need to raise rates. That would
kill many bubbles, would it not? This is worrying investors, who see
the asset bubbles in China as a potential time bomb, when rates start
rising in the US. I am a bit less pessimistic on this issue. First,
this is nothing new. It has been going on for a long time and with
different countries, as it was denounced back in the ’30s by Jacques
Rueff. Secondly, the Bank of China, like any other central bank, always
has unlimited means to debase its currency, if they deem it necessary.
Please, note that if this scenario played out, the biggest loser here
would be gold…
-Emerging Markets:
There is increasing concern on the public finances of Mexico and
Brazil. The potential future problems, like the global imbalances that
grow by the hour, are still far ahead on the horizon. But the issue
with these economies, in my view, is not potential shocks, but their
leaders’ sudden and unpredictable reactions to them. In any case, if
there were a financial panic, the contagion effect across the globe
would be very painful.
-Rates, credit and stocks:
By now, I guess the market has come to understand that stocks have been
driven by rates, via the credit markets (Rates decrease as central
banks buy securities, the liquidity so injected goes to refinance short
term debt, firms delever and together with cost-cutting measures, the
value of the call option on the firms’ assets (=value of their equity)
rises). The market now seems to accept the futility of seeking
fundamentals to justify valuations; the irrelevance of calling an asset
class over or undervalued. Liquidity injections distorted all relative
prices and relative value comparisons work at best, in my view, within
the same asset class. Having said this, what if rates rose? I don’t
want to answer this question, because I am convinced rates will not
rise until activity picks up meaningfully. The other side of this is
the high risk of inflation that would come out of such scenario. Would
bonds not sell off? I need to think more about this, but for now, I am
not convinced to take either side…
The comments expressed in this
website and daily letters are my own personal opinions only and do not
necessarily reflect the positions or opinions of my employer or its
affiliates. All comments are based upon my current knowledge and my own
personal experiences. You should conduct independent research to verify
the validity of any statements made in this website before basing any
decisions upon those statements. In addition, any views or opinions
expressed by visitors to this website are theirs and do not necessarily
reflect mine. My comments provide general information only. Neither the
information nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation, an
offer or an invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any securities
or other financial instrument or any derivative related to such
securities or instruments (e.g., options, futures, warrants, and
contracts for differences). My comments are not intended to provide
personal investment advice and they do not take into account the
specific investment objectives, financial situation and the particular
needs of any specific person.