"He's a snake in the grass, I tell ya guys; he may look dumb but that's just a disguise; he's a mastermind in the ways of espionage." Charlie Daniels, "Uneasy Rider" Evolution & religion: Idle hands express idle thoughts about Bob Murphy`s determination to apply reason to his insistence that "non-believers burn in hell" - TT's Lost in Tokyo

Evolution & religion: Idle hands express idle thoughts about Bob Murphy`s determination to apply reason to his insistence that "non-believers burn in hell"

I refer to Bob Murphy`s blog post, "Do Non-Believers Burn in Hell?", which is still active, but with little further contribution from Bob (who`s been busy doing God`s work  on other matters). In the post Bob asserts that "the doctrines of Christianity make sense and are logical" and attempts to explain what he means by his belief that atheists are "going to hell."

Below are my two posts on the thread.  The first asks Bob to clarify his logic; the second steps back to meta-issues that are too often unexplored in arguments over religion.

A. June 14, 2009 5:23 AM

Bob, if you`re in favor of using your reason when contemplating God, can you tell me:

1. is there a hell? what evidence is there for hell?

2. Who goes to hell? You suggest "personSleep who actively rejected the Creator's offer of friendship", but by this (a) do you imply that everyone got a "personal" offer? how so?

(b) if not, what happens to those throughout human history who never got a personal offer, or who thought their offer was to follow Judaism, Islam, the Budddha, etc?

(c) what about those with limited capacity - children (including those stillborn, or naturally or artificially aborted), the mentally handicapped? do they burn in hell for eternity, or are they united in communion with the Creator?

I`m not sure where reason leads us in matters of faith, other than we have a capacity to believe all manner of what seems obvious nonsense now.

B.  June 22, 2009 4:42 AM

James, I think you are being far too judgmental.

And I think this discussion generally is too shallow.

Can I suggest that you - and others - step back to consider the role of "Ritual and Religion in the Making of Humanity," as explored in a book of that title by Roy Rappaport (former head of the American Anthropology Assn. and published postumously)?

Rappaport recognized the role that ritual and "sacred postulates" (later, religions) have played in the evolution of man as a social animal, by providing a fundamental way of ordering the world, the group`s role in it, and the individual`s role in the group - thereby abating commons problems both within and created by the group.

The religious lies at the root of our human nature, even as its inviolable, sacred truths continue to fall by the wayside during the long march of culture and science out of the Garden of Eden.

Amazon

Google Books

review by Mary Catherine Bateson

Interview

Especially as we live in an increasingly global world, it behooves us all to know ourselves better - even us hermits in Tokyo.

Can we sheath our vorpal swords?

 

 

 

Published Mon, Jun 22 2009 6:45 PM by TokyoTom

Comments

# Fun with self-deception: those who espouse an "objective" moral order act refuse to elucidate, or act as if there is none

Friday, August 28, 2009 10:30 AM by TT`s Lost in Tokyo

I refer to my previous posts on the interesting subject of whether there is an "objective moral