I decided to read something by Rothbard and I was looking through the contents of
For a New Liberty - http://mises.org/rothbard/newlibertywhole.asp#contents
and The Ethics of Liberty - http://mises.org/rothbard/ethics/ethics.asp
and there seems to be a fair bit of overlap. I was wondering if I could get some opinions on which is the better of the two, or if they are both wonderful unique snowflakes worth reading.
Thanks.
FANL is more about "how might an anarchist society handle this" whereas TEOL is "what would be the law in an anarchist society, roughly?" The two are different and the overlap is minimal.
Freedom of markets is positively correlated with the degree of evolution in any society...
Danneracci: I decided to read something by Rothbard and I was looking through the contents of For a New Liberty - http://mises.org/rothbard/newlibertywhole.asp#contents and The Ethics of Liberty - http://mises.org/rothbard/ethics/ethics.asp and there seems to be a fair bit of overlap. I was wondering if I could get some opinions on which is the better of the two, or if they are both wonderful unique snowflakes worth reading. Thanks.
"Look at me, I'm quoting another user to show how wrong I think they are, out of arrogance of my own position. Wait, this is my own quote, oh shi-" ~ Nitroadict
I just wish FANL would be updated, in case the taxation methodology has altered, to reflect that; maybe in the intro or in an editor's footnote? FANL is IMO the book I'd give to a borderline libertarian to bring them to anarchism. It addresses a lot of important practical questions about anarchism. Before even contemplating the stuff TEOL raises, they'd need the groundwork FANL sets down.
Cool. I'm going to start on FANL and I'll get to Ethics at another date.
Both in the mail. Come on Mr Postman... (If only there was a free market in mail/delivery/postage). The books are probably being rifled through in customs, as I type.