Free Capitalist Network - Community Archive
Mises Community Archive
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Book suggestion. FANL or TEOL?

rated by 0 users
This post has 5 Replies | 0 Followers

Not Ranked
Posts 27
Points 510
Danneracci Posted: Thu, Apr 23 2009 9:53 PM

I decided to read something by Rothbard and I was looking through the contents of

For a New Liberty - http://mises.org/rothbard/newlibertywhole.asp#contents

and The Ethics of Liberty - http://mises.org/rothbard/ethics/ethics.asp

and there seems to be a fair bit of overlap. I was wondering if I could get some opinions on which is the better of the two, or if they are both wonderful unique snowflakes worth reading.

Thanks.

 

  • | Post Points: 50
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 5,255
Points 80,815
ForumsAdministrator
Moderator
SystemAdministrator

FANL is more about "how might an anarchist society handle this" whereas TEOL is "what would be the law in an anarchist society, roughly?" The two are different and the overlap is minimal.

Freedom of markets is positively correlated with the degree of evolution in any society...

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 2,221
Points 34,050
Moderator
Nitroadict replied on Thu, Apr 23 2009 10:25 PM

 

Danneracci:

I decided to read something by Rothbard and I was looking through the contents of

For a New Liberty - http://mises.org/rothbard/newlibertywhole.asp#contents

and The Ethics of Liberty - http://mises.org/rothbard/ethics/ethics.asp

and there seems to be a fair bit of overlap. I was wondering if I could get some opinions on which is the better of the two, or if they are both wonderful unique snowflakes worth reading.

Thanks.

 



The only complaint I have about FANL is the first half of the taxation chapter, which would be less tedious to read than to listen to (seeing as it's statistics being listed, although important ones, albeit).  

TEOL struck me as more advanced (under the assumption that understanding earlier works makes the later works easier to digest), so I opted for FANL instead (it was also the first libertarian audiobook I attempted as well).  

For what it's worth, I've seen TEOL referenced here more frequently than FANL, though.

"Look at me, I'm quoting another user to show how wrong I think they are, out of arrogance of my own position. Wait, this is my own quote, oh shi-" ~ Nitroadict

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 5,255
Points 80,815
ForumsAdministrator
Moderator
SystemAdministrator

I just wish FANL would be updated, in case the taxation methodology has altered, to reflect that; maybe in the intro or in an editor's footnote? FANL is IMO the book I'd give to a borderline libertarian to bring them to anarchism. It addresses a lot of important practical questions about anarchism. Before even contemplating the stuff TEOL raises, they'd need the groundwork FANL sets down.

Freedom of markets is positively correlated with the degree of evolution in any society...

  • | Post Points: 20
Not Ranked
Posts 27
Points 510
Danneracci replied on Thu, Apr 23 2009 11:15 PM

Cool. I'm going to start on FANL and I'll get to Ethics at another date.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 2,943
Points 49,130
SystemAdministrator
Conza88 replied on Fri, Apr 24 2009 4:12 AM

Both in the mail. Come on Mr Postman... (If only there was a free market in mail/delivery/postage). The books are probably being rifled through in customs, as I type.

Ron Paul is for self-government when compared to the Constitution. He's an anarcho-capitalist. Proof.
  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (6 items) | RSS