Free Capitalist Network - Community Archive
Mises Community Archive
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Advanced Civilizations May Have an Advantage We Don't

rated by 0 users
This post has 17 Replies | 5 Followers

Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,028
Points 51,580
limitgov Posted: Mon, Jan 11 2010 2:57 PM

I remember reading a while back, an article from lewrockwell that talked about if an advanced civilization were to make contact with us, they probably wouldn't have a government, or at least nothing like we have.

 

That got me thinking.  Can a civilization only advance to interstellar travel technology by no having a destructive entity like a government?

Maybe yes, maybe no.  I used to think yes.  They could not have a government to hold them back and steal and kill them to advance.

 

 

Unless...they had telepathic abilities.

 

Then, even if they had a very minimal government structure, they could not keep any secrets from each other.  No deceptions, no lies.

 

Maybe that is the missing key to advancement.

  • | Post Points: 50
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 11,343
Points 194,945
ForumsAdministrator
Moderator
SystemAdministrator

Decentralization is the key to advancement.

"When you're young you worry about people stealing your ideas, when you're old you worry that they won't." - David Friedman
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 6,885
Points 121,845
Clayton replied on Mon, Jan 11 2010 3:07 PM

limitgov:

I remember reading a while back, an article from lewrockwell that talked about if an advanced civilization were to make contact with us, they probably wouldn't have a government, or at least nothing like we have.

 

That got me thinking.  Can a civilization only advance to interstellar travel technology by no having a destructive entity like a government?

Maybe yes, maybe no.  I used to think yes.  They could not have a government to hold them back and steal and kill them to advance.

 

 

Unless...they had telepathic abilities.

 

Then, even if they had a very minimal government structure, they could not keep any secrets from each other.  No deceptions, no lies.

 

Maybe that is the missing key to advancement.

I'm not sure what use sci-fi is to analysis of real-world problems. In any case, privacy or secrecy is a crucial component of human prosperity. The problem with government is not that it keeps secrets, rather, it is that the costs of its actions are socialized. This causes the government to become aggressive and expansive because the decision-makers within government reap the benefits of successes but do not bear the costs of failures.

Clayton -

http://voluntaryistreader.wordpress.com
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,028
Points 51,580
limitgov replied on Mon, Jan 11 2010 3:24 PM

well, either way...

I understand that gov. is destructive regardless...all they can do is take away our life, liberty and property...

but the mob will keep turning to government if they are ignorant...

maybe it will take telepathic abilities for the common person to realize what we already realize...

that government is destructive.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 445
Points 9,445
CrazyCoot replied on Mon, Jan 11 2010 3:53 PM

 If any alien beings were to land on our planet we'd have to kill them to survive.

  • | Post Points: 50
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 7,105
Points 115,240
ForumsAdministrator
Moderator
SystemAdministrator

CrazyCoot:
 If any alien beings were to land on our planet we'd have to kill them to survive.

neo-con alert Stick out tongue

Where there is no property there is no justice; a proposition as certain as any demonstration in Euclid

Fools! not to see that what they madly desire would be a calamity to them as no hands but their own could bring

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 3,592
Points 63,685
Sieben replied on Mon, Jan 11 2010 4:15 PM

Chances are equally likely that we'll actually be the aliens making first contact. Be nifty if they're all like "What is government? That's a stupid idea how would a legal monopoly on legitimate use of violence solve anything?"

Banned
  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 369
Points 7,175
baxter replied on Mon, Jan 11 2010 4:53 PM

CrazyCoot:

 If any alien beings were to land on our planet we'd have to kill them to survive.

Good luck. It would be like a bunch of cavemen throwing rocks at IronMan. Most likely any aliens capable of travelling here also have invisiblity cloaks, which we are only just researching. I'm sure it's also easy enough to doom a planet by making tiny alterations to asteroid trajectories.

"Unless...they had telepathic abilities."

Voluntary sharing of information through telepathy would not be much different from using a telephone. And I don't see how even non-consensual mind-reading would alter fundamental laws of economics.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 4,532
Points 84,495
Stranger replied on Mon, Jan 11 2010 6:23 PM

CrazyCoot:

 If any alien beings were to land on our planet we'd have to kill them to survive.

The principle of the division of labor and free trade is universal. It applies to aliens, post-humans, robots, A.I. superintelligence, anything that thinks.

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 350
Points 5,405
kiba replied on Mon, Jan 11 2010 6:27 PM

Stranger:

CrazyCoot:

 If any alien beings were to land on our planet we'd have to kill them to survive.

The principle of the division of labor and free trade is universal. It applies to aliens, post-humans, robots, A.I. superintelligence, anything that thinks.

Unless they saw us only as food.

 

http://libregamewiki.org - The world's only encyclopedia on free(as in freedom) gaming.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 445
Points 9,445
CrazyCoot replied on Mon, Jan 11 2010 6:29 PM

Well, if you want to be Zaphod Beetlebrox's pet then fair enough.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 150 Contributor
Male
Posts 554
Points 9,130
Praetyre replied on Mon, Jan 11 2010 6:45 PM

You know, I keep saying we need a "Weird Hypothetical Questions" section. I rather fear what CrazyCoot's stance is on immigration.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 4,532
Points 84,495
Stranger replied on Mon, Jan 11 2010 6:48 PM

kiba:

 

Unless they saw us only as food.

There's no reason for them to see us as food anymore than there is for us to see the lower races of humans as food.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 445
Points 9,445
CrazyCoot replied on Mon, Jan 11 2010 6:53 PM

If the incoming immigrants had diseases to which the existing community had no defenses to I'd say kill em all.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Male
Posts 328
Points 5,650

Government will lose all its power in space. Once people are free to traverse the solar system and then the stars, there will be no way for the state to exercise their authority over free people. Space is simply too massive and the state will be spread way too thin. There will be too many places to hide. In a way, it is the geographical considerations of living on a planet that has aided in the growth and success of the state. Once we break free of the Earthian paradigm, the state will either collapse, or become irrelevant to the day to day operations of free space-farers. 

  • | Post Points: 50
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 11,343
Points 194,945
ForumsAdministrator
Moderator
SystemAdministrator

JosephBright:
Government will lose all its power in space. Once people are free to traverse the solar system and then the stars, there will be no way for the state to exercise their authority over free people. Space is simply too massive and the state will be spread way too thin. There will be too many places to hide. In a way, it is the geographical considerations of living on a planet that has aided in the growth and success of the state. Once we break free of the Earthian paradigm, the state will either collapse, or become irrelevant to the day to day operations of free space-farers. 

You are the only other person (besides myself) on this forum who has written something like that (which I can recall).  I could hug you right now.

5 stars.  +10,000.  Co-signed.

"When you're young you worry about people stealing your ideas, when you're old you worry that they won't." - David Friedman
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,028
Points 51,580
limitgov replied on Tue, Jan 12 2010 8:53 PM

JosephBright:

Government will lose all its power in space. Once people are free to traverse the solar system and then the stars, there will be no way for the state to exercise their authority over free people. Space is simply too massive and the state will be spread way too thin. There will be too many places to hide. In a way, it is the geographical considerations of living on a planet that has aided in the growth and success of the state. Once we break free of the Earthian paradigm, the state will either collapse, or become irrelevant to the day to day operations of free space-farers. 

 

It is interesting to note that all attempts to weaponize space have been stopped.

And of course, there's the famous cases where nuclear warheads have had their codes or something disabled.

It appears that any attempt at violence in space will not be permitted.

 

And i believe it is due to the fact that any advanced civilization that is here, can only achieve that advancement by being peaceful and loving.

 

 

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 2,209
Points 35,645
Merlin replied on Thu, Jan 21 2010 9:19 AM

JosephBright:

Government will lose all its power in space. Once people are free to traverse the solar system and then the stars, there will be no way for the state to exercise their authority over free people. Space is simply too massive and the state will be spread way too thin. There will be too many places to hide. In a way, it is the geographical considerations of living on a planet that has aided in the growth and success of the state. Once we break free of the Earthian paradigm, the state will either collapse, or become irrelevant to the day to day operations of free space-farers. 

I’m afraid that would only set humanity back to a time when a thousand states existed but where so further apart that no one could easily emigrate. That is multiple dictatorships. Again, I’m afraid that  fleeing the state, be it in space, won’t do it.

 

I’d even say that even if anarchy had been achieved on earth by then, the emergence of initially small communities so far apart would allow states to be born anew.

 

 

The Regression theorem is a memetic equivalent of the Theory of Evolution. To say that the former precludes the free emergence of fiat currencies makes no more sense that to hold that the latter precludes the natural emergence of multicellular organisms.
  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (18 items) | RSS