Free Capitalist Network - Community Archive
Mises Community Archive
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Was England during the Industrial Revolution a true laissez faire economy?

rated by 0 users
Not Answered This post has 0 verified answers | 7 Replies | 2 Followers

Top 500 Contributor
Male
244 Posts
Points 5,455
Felipe posted on Mon, Feb 8 2010 9:18 AM

What is the final word of the austrians?

Was there government intervention somewhere or was it a truly free economy?

  • | Post Points: 65

All Replies

Top 200 Contributor
Male
470 Posts
Points 7,025
Vitor replied on Mon, Feb 8 2010 9:43 AM

There was some clearly goverment intervention at the time, remember it was also the time of the british empire and there was also some patent abuse on the steam machine for example.

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
67 Posts
Points 940

Two examples of intervention I can think of off-hand:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corn_Laws

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inclosure_Acts

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 75 Contributor
1,005 Posts
Points 19,030

Let's not forget the government workhouses where a young dickens grew up and experienced the horrors of industry first hand.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Male
326 Posts
Points 5,135

The Inclosure Acts where a huge intervention. The government basically expropriated 21% of all land in England ... at a time when agriculture was pretty important.

The inclosures forced urbanisation at a much faster rate then what was happening naturally. Leading to miserable standards of living in the cities, one can expect miserable living conditions since people where poor but with the Inclosure Acts not everyone that moved into the cities where actually better of then if they had been allowed to stay. This also explains the horrible standards on housing that are present in the UK to this date.

Alot of economic historians are saying they where the consequence of capitalism and the fact that other countries didn't build such horrible housing was because they had learned from the UK. I think a more reasonable explanation is that people would have waited a bit and not moved into such poor housing if they hadn't been forced to by the Inclosure Acts.

Escaping Leviathan - regardless of public opinion

"Democracy is the road to socialism." - Karl Marx

  • | Post Points: 20
Not Ranked
81 Posts
Points 1,665

The land that was enclosed was by custom land owned by tennant farmers. Although in theory tennants were the just owners of all the land having mixed their labour with it - not the aristocracy.

It meant that the independent yeoman class, who owned their own means of production were turned via the state into propertyless labourers who were forced to take work in the Dark Satanic Mills of 19th century England. The capital for these mills being obtained by primitive accumulation i.e. Land Theft, Slavery and Mercantilism.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
1,133 Posts
Points 20,435
Jargon replied on Mon, Jul 23 2012 7:57 PM

I'm having a hard time finding stuff on the Dickensian-English Political Economy, so *bump*.  Maybe some of you know more about it.

Land & Liberty

The Anarch is to the Anarchist what the Monarch is to the Monarchist. -Ernst Jünger

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Male
4,987 Posts
Points 89,490

All I have read about Britain in the Industrial Revolution is about Child Labor:

http://www.thefreemanonline.org/columns/ideas-and-consequences/child-labor-and-the-british-industrial-revolution-2/

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (8 items) | RSS