Free Capitalist Network - Community Archive
Mises Community Archive
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

In other news: Nationalization creates capital

rated by 0 users
This post has 4 Replies | 1 Follower

Top 500 Contributor
Posts 342
Points 7,875
LvMIenthusiast Posted: Mon, Mar 8 2010 5:06 PM

This is what my professor claimed the other day and I laughed. He acted as if no private sector ever existed in the history of man. I didn't even bother contesting him on that one. Indifferent

 

This topic should be a continuing thread on all the stupid statements people have somehow gathered the energy to mutter.

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 274
Points 5,675

"You know what guys? I think the government should create a trillion dollars and distribute it to all the poor people of the world! Then there would be no poor people! Hurray!"

 

"The Olympics are paid almost entirely by the Olympic Committee"

 

"Government intervention to protect the environment works, look at the Ozone Layer and Acid Rain!"

 

"If there were no rich people, poor people wouldn't be around either"

 

"If it weren't for government funding and intervention, there would be no fuel efficient cars!"

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
Male
Posts 1,129
Points 16,635

My Buddy:

"If there were no rich people, poor people wouldn't be around either"

Actually, we'ed all be equally poor. :p

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 222
Points 2,995
Valject replied on Tue, Mar 9 2010 12:08 AM

LvMIenthusiast:

This is what my professor claimed the other day and I laughed. He acted as if no private sector ever existed in the history of man. I didn't even bother contesting him on that one. Indifferent

 

This topic should be a continuing thread on all the stupid statements people have somehow gathered the energy to mutter.

Did he have...like...an argument to go along with this?  I mean, even if it is, and I know it will be, a bad one?  A nationalization of anything only works if there is enough tax money in the pool.  Take, for instance, public schools.  Districts run out of money and try to pass a millage.  It doesn't pass, so more money can't be heisted from the taxpayer to keep the school afloat.  There is no other option but to start laying off teachers and closing schools, unless you want to divert funds from some other public service.  There is no way to say, "Hmm...we are losing money.  Perhaps if we do X we can raise some funds."  You always have to go back to the taxpayer.  And that's putting aside the bureaucrats needed to run a nationalized system.  Bureaucrats are paid with taxpayer money, and are a net loss on the wealth of a nation.  The bureaucrat produces nothing.  Since he produces nothing, there is no way to determine the bureaucrat's market wage rate.  Therefore, no matter how much he is being paid, it is too much.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 150 Contributor
Male
Posts 767
Points 11,240
Hard Rain replied on Tue, Mar 9 2010 12:11 AM

The only "nationalized" gold mine in South Africa is bleeding money like a stuck pig. Only government could screw up something like that so epically.

"I don't believe in ghosts, sermons, or stories about money" - Rooster Cogburn, True Grit.
  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (5 items) | RSS