Free Capitalist Network - Community Archive
Mises Community Archive
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Most popular advocates of a free economy

rated by 0 users
This post has 13 Replies | 1 Follower

Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,417
Points 41,720
Moderator
Nielsio Posted: Sat, Mar 13 2010 2:10 PM

According to a little research on Google Trends, the most well known/popular advocates of a free economy are (with relative scores):

Ron Paul (1.0)
Ayn Rand (0.4)
Penn & Teller (0.32)
Milton Friedman (0.2)
Peter Schiff (0.1)
John Stossel (0.06)
Lew Rockwell (0.04)
Tom Woods / Thomas Woods (0.04)
David Friedman (< 0.03)
Ludwig von Mises (0.01)
Friedrich Hayek (0.0045)
Murray Rothbard (0.0005)

 

Who am I missing?

  • | Post Points: 80
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,956
Points 56,800
bloomj31 replied on Sat, Mar 13 2010 2:12 PM

Pretty solid list, I would add Jim Demint.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 2,651
Points 51,325
Moderator

I'm surprised Milton Friedman is only a 0.2.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,417
Points 41,720
Moderator
Nielsio replied on Sat, Mar 13 2010 2:52 PM

bloomj31:

Pretty solid list, I would add Jim Demint.

Jim Demint:

- Against all forms of abortion, including cases of rape and incest
- Against gay marriage
- Against gay people teaching in public schools
- Against single mothers teaching in public schools
- Wants a policy to reduce energy dependency
- Wants a policy to encourage alternative energy
- Wants to work on an 'encouragement for housing' ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CSaSslYT7l0 )
- Wants to keep tax credits for having children ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bXQ2GLhLd0Q )
- Criticized Obama for lacking focus on terrorism since taking office

 

He's a religious right conservative, he's not a true 'Ron Paul' free economy advocate. He's certainly much better than most other republicans, but this is a list of freedom advocates, and as a freedom advocate you absolutely must have a consistent and pure philosophy.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,956
Points 56,800
bloomj31 replied on Sat, Mar 13 2010 2:56 PM

Well no, he's not a libertarian.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,417
Points 41,720
Moderator
Nielsio replied on Sat, Mar 13 2010 2:58 PM

krazy kaju:

I'm surprised Milton Friedman is only a 0.2.

The first numbers were based on 'all years'. Ron Paul was very popular during his presidential campaign, which skews the numbers. So these are the numbers for the 'last 12 months':

Ron Paul (1.0)
Ayn Rand (0.78)
Peter Schiff (0.42)
Penn & Teller (0.42)
Milton Friedman (0.26)
John Stossel (0.14)
Tom Woods / Thomas Woods (0.14)
Lew Rockwell (0.1)
Ludwig von Mises (0.04)
David Friedman (< 0.04)
Friedrich Hayek (0.02)
Murray Rothbard (0.004)

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 785
Points 13,445

.... What exactly is it that the numbers show? .02 percent popularity? Is that to say 2% popularity? What?

It's understandable why those people who are actually alive and active twoards the public would be at the top, Atlas Shrugged is one of the best selling novels ever, Mises and Rothbard are relativly unknown out of economic circles while Friedman was the second most important and probably the most famous economist of the 20th century, Hayek was extremely influential but not well known outside of the economics profession, Thomas Woods and Lew Rockwell are also rather obscure... In 5 years, who knows?

"Lo! I am weary of my wisdom, like the bee that hath gathered too much honey; I need hands outstretched to take it." -Thus Spake Zarathustra
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,417
Points 41,720
Moderator
Nielsio replied on Sat, Mar 13 2010 4:31 PM

The Late Andrew Ryan:

.... What exactly is it that the numbers show? .02 percent popularity? Is that to say 2% popularity? What?

Like I mentioned, they are relative scores. They are only meaningful relative to each other.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 2,209
Points 35,645
Merlin replied on Sat, Mar 13 2010 5:00 PM

I was under the impression that Hayek was much better known than that. Perhaps he's better known in Europe.

The Regression theorem is a memetic equivalent of the Theory of Evolution. To say that the former precludes the free emergence of fiat currencies makes no more sense that to hold that the latter precludes the natural emergence of multicellular organisms.
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,417
Points 41,720
Moderator
Nielsio replied on Sat, Mar 13 2010 5:11 PM

Merlin:

I was under the impression that Hayek was much better known than that. Perhaps he's better known in Europe.

Remember these figures are only about search queries (and possibly news hits). So they're not that significant, though probably still a good rough indicator.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 2,051
Points 36,080
Bert replied on Sat, Mar 13 2010 10:31 PM

Nielsio:

 

Ron Paul (1.0)
Ayn Rand (0.4)
Penn & Teller (0.32)
Milton Friedman (0.2)
Peter Schiff (0.1)
John Stossel (0.06)
Lew Rockwell (0.04)
Tom Woods / Thomas Woods (0.04)
David Friedman (< 0.03)
Ludwig von Mises (0.01)
Friedrich Hayek (0.0045)
Murray Rothbard (0.0005)

Before I opened this I had a feeling that whatever list there is Ron Paul would be on the top.  I'm not that surprised to see Ayn Rand as second, but having both Ayn Rand and Milton Friedman in the top 5 bothers me (and I don't really know anything about Penn & Teller involving the free-market).  When I get into a conversation with someone who's not knowledgable about free-market economics, or a socialist/leftist, the first people they name to seem like they know what they are talking about is Rand and Friedman.  I honestly don't know how people can come across Friedman before Rothbard or Mises.

I had always been impressed by the fact that there are a surprising number of individuals who never use their minds if they can avoid it, and an equal number who do use their minds, but in an amazingly stupid way. - Carl Jung, Man and His Symbols
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,417
Points 41,720
Moderator
Nielsio replied on Sat, Mar 13 2010 11:07 PM

Bert:

Before I opened this I had a feeling that whatever list there is Ron Paul would be on the top.  I'm not that surprised to see Ayn Rand as second, but having both Ayn Rand and Milton Friedman in the top 5 bothers me (and I don't really know anything about Penn & Teller involving the free-market).  When I get into a conversation with someone who's not knowledgable about free-market economics, or a socialist/leftist, the first people they name to seem like they know what they are talking about is Rand and Friedman.  I honestly don't know how people can come across Friedman before Rothbard or Mises.

Friedman has been on TV a lot. He actually does have a bunch of good - and even great - things to say. Look through the uploads from: http://www.youtube.com/user/LibertyPen . And then there's his 'Free to Choose' series, which helped me out a lot too when I was younger.

It's just sad that he couldn't be consistent and apply his free market insight to all things.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Male
Posts 358
Points 8,245

Penn Jillette of Penn & Teller got me into libertarianism through his former radio show Penn Radio. The archives can be found here: http://www.pennfans.net/category/Audio_Archive/PennRadio/

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,417
Points 41,720
Moderator
Nielsio replied on Sat, Mar 13 2010 11:26 PM

Cal:

Penn Jillette of Penn & Teller got me into libertarianism through his former radio show Penn Radio. The archives can be found here: http://www.pennfans.net/category/Audio_Archive/PennRadio/

Their show 'Bullshit' is well-made, and works for a mainstream-esque audience, yet cuts through a lot lefty, superstitious, and nanny-state bullshit.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0346369/episodes

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (14 items) | RSS