Free Capitalist Network - Community Archive
Mises Community Archive
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

The Fallacy of Race

rated by 0 users
This post has 49 Replies | 7 Followers

Top 100 Contributor
Male
Posts 985
Points 17,110
Stephen replied on Thu, Apr 8 2010 9:11 PM

Marko:

Stephen:

For example, Chinese on average have a higher level of natural intelligence than whites or jews.

What if we compared 19th century Chinese and 19th century whites?

I have no idea.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 100 Contributor
Male
Posts 985
Points 17,110
Stephen replied on Thu, Apr 8 2010 9:17 PM

baxter:

>Blacks are overall more naturally athletic than whites. In terms of athleticism, they are superior.

Yet there are some sports where they do not seem to thrive. The statement is clearly a matter of opinion and not of science. Atheletic and intellectual ability cannot be scientifically measured.

It is just my general observation. Yes, blacks are terrible swimmers, and MMA will probably always be dominated by whites. On the other hand, basketball, football, 100 metre dash, ect will always be dominated by blacks. They seem to have better muscle control, dexterity, balance, physical strength, and physical endurance.

baxter:
How do you even measure a person who might far exceed the average in athleticism, yet simply chooses not to exercise such abilities.

idk. I also don't see the relevance.

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 100 Contributor
Male
Posts 985
Points 17,110
Stephen replied on Thu, Apr 8 2010 9:19 PM

auctionguy10:

Stephen:

. Blacks are overall more naturally athletic than whites. In terms of athleticism, they are superior.

I'd say this has a lot to do with actually engaging in a lot more physical activity than whites. Like you know how people say "yeah black people are naturally gifted at things like basketball"- but ignore the hours and hours and hours of time spent practicing the game since they were young as if it doesn't mean anything.

My observation is that individuals tend to have a drive for activities they excel at and lose interest in activities they are not very good at.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 3,739
Points 60,635
Marko replied on Thu, Apr 8 2010 9:47 PM

Stephen:

It is just my general observation. Yes, blacks are terrible swimmers, and MMA will probably always be dominated by whites. On the other hand, basketball, football, 100 metre dash, ect will always be dominated by blacks. They seem to have better muscle control, dexterity, balance, physical strength, and physical endurance.

"Blacks" doesn't describe anyone when we are talking sports. Kenyans and Ethiopians excel at totally different sports than Nigerians or Ghanians.

Stephen:

Marko:

Stephen:

For example, Chinese on average have a higher level of natural intelligence than whites or jews.

What if we compared 19th century Chinese and 19th century whites?

I have no idea.

Then how do you know the difference has to do with race?

 

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 100 Contributor
Male
Posts 985
Points 17,110
Stephen replied on Thu, Apr 8 2010 10:32 PM

Marko:
"Blacks" doesn't describe anyone when we are talking sports. Kenyans and Ethiopians excel at totally different sports than Nigerians or Ghanians.

I don't disagree. The more refined the distinction, the more accurate the results.

Marko:
Then how do you know the difference has to do with race?

Because there are IQ differences on average between members of different races when environment is controlled for.

The point is that yesterday's Chinese and Europeans are not the same as today's. I would guess that 19th century Chinese were more intelligent however, because the evidence indicates that groups evolving in harsher climatic conditions tend to develop higher levels of intelligence.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 3,739
Points 60,635
Marko replied on Thu, Apr 8 2010 10:43 PM

Stephen:

Because there are IQ differences on average between members of different races when environment is controlled for.

And what would be an example of this 'controlled environment'?

 

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 100 Contributor
Male
Posts 985
Points 17,110
Stephen replied on Fri, Apr 9 2010 9:06 AM

Marko:

Stephen:

Because there are IQ differences on average between members of different races when environment is controlled for.

And what would be an example of this 'controlled environment'?

If you take ppl who have the same upbringing, education, and income level, any significant difference can hardly be attributed to environmental factors.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 3,739
Points 60,635
Marko replied on Fri, Apr 9 2010 6:23 PM

Stephen:

If you take ppl who have the same upbringing, education, and income level, any significant difference can hardly be attributed to environmental factors.

But that's not an example.

 

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 369
Points 7,175
baxter replied on Fri, Apr 9 2010 7:17 PM

>They [blacks] seem to have better muscle control, dexterity, balance, physical strength, and physical endurance.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deadlift: "The record for the tire deadlift (in which hummer tires are used in place of plates) under Strongman rules where lifting straps are allowed is 498.9 kg (1100 lbs) by Benedikt Magnússon."

By your argument, if this guy has superior physical strength, then Magnusson must be an African name.

As far as Chinese having higher IQ or whatever, I can't name a single famous Chinese mathematician, physicist, or economist. Euler, Ramanujan, Gauss, Leibniz, Newton, Jacobi, Legendre, Pascal, Bernoulli, Goldbach, Riemann, Siegel, Euclid, Fermat, Borwein, Minkowski, Kanada, Einstein, Faraday, Maxwell, Rutherford, Bohr, Schrodinger, Feynman, Kaku, Chandresakar, Hawking, Mises, Rothbard, Hayek, Bohm-Bawerk, Bastiat, Smith, Ricardo, Menger  - not one of them Chinese. Well, I guess Li is Chinese and did make a contribution to Riemann Hypothesis, but I'm not sure he's that famous.

So I guess my ancedotal, non-scientific, biased opinion pulled out of my butt outweighs yours. I assign a crap quotient (CQ) of 147 to my opinion, while yours is only 86, making my opinion more than 60 crap points superior.

 

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 100 Contributor
Male
Posts 985
Points 17,110
Stephen replied on Fri, Apr 9 2010 9:47 PM

baxter:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deadlift: "The record for the tire deadlift (in which hummer tires are used in place of plates) under Strongman rules where lifting straps are allowed is 498.9 kg (1100 lbs) by Benedikt Magnússon."

By your argument, if this guy has superior physical strength, then Magnusson must be an African name.

Based on my sample size of one...

baxter:
As far as Chinese having higher IQ or whatever, I can't name a single famous Chinese mathematician, physicist, or economist. Euler, Ramanujan, Gauss, Leibniz, Newton, Jacobi, Legendre, Pascal, Bernoulli, Goldbach, Riemann, Siegel, Euclid, Fermat, Borwein, Minkowski, Kanada, Einstein, Faraday, Maxwell, Rutherford, Bohr, Schrodinger, Feynman, Kaku, Chandresakar, Hawking, Mises, Rothbard, Hayek, Bohm-Bawerk, Bastiat, Smith, Ricardo, Menger  - not one of them Chinese. Well, I guess Li is Chinese and did make a contribution to Riemann Hypothesis, but I'm not sure he's that famous.

Cultural and institutional factors count as well. This doesn't prove what you want it to.

baxter:
So I guess my ancedotal, non-scientific, biased opinion pulled out of my butt outweighs yours. I assign a crap quotient (CQ) of 147 to my opinion, while yours is only 86, making my opinion more than 60 crap points superior.

Real mature.

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 2 of 2 (50 items) < Previous 1 2 | RSS