Free Capitalist Network - Community Archive
Mises Community Archive
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

What is the 'praxeological' status of WW3? if any

rated by 0 users
This post has 5 Replies | 3 Followers

Top 500 Contributor
Male
Posts 289
Points 9,530
Kenneth Posted: Mon, Jun 14 2010 11:38 PM

Is WW3 within the next 20 years apodictically certain? What are the factors involved?

Top 500 Contributor
Male
Posts 289
Points 9,530
Kenneth replied on Mon, Jun 14 2010 11:41 PM

All the major wars in the 20th century or at least despotic regimes seem to follow from a period of inflation, political hysteria, and protectionism. I know correlation doesn't prove causation, but maybe there's a causal relationship here. I just can't point it out.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 2,209
Points 35,645
Merlin replied on Tue, Jun 15 2010 1:29 AM

There is causation. Protectionism makes the other country valueless to us. Even worse, if we cant trade with outside countries, than to trade more we have to incorporate countries, thus go to war.

 

The thing with high inflation is that perhaps a fiat currency at some point just looses convertibility with ‘hard’ currencies and as such shits all trade, again making war profitable.

 

Yet I would not be so sure that WW3 is coming. Countries have nukes nowadays, and the cost of a war would be far, far to high. what we could see are civil wars of disgregation, mostly in Europe and perhaps in the US too. But just a guess.

The Regression theorem is a memetic equivalent of the Theory of Evolution. To say that the former precludes the free emergence of fiat currencies makes no more sense that to hold that the latter precludes the natural emergence of multicellular organisms.
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,491
Points 43,390
scineram replied on Tue, Jun 15 2010 6:25 PM

Nothing. 

 

/thread

  • | Post Points: 20
Not Ranked
Posts 1
Points 5

War cannot be seen as apodictically certain at any given point.  We can be apodictically certain that individuals will make choices that maximize their happiness, but at this moment we cannot understand those hypothetical future decisions and the definitions of happiness that the actors involved in the decision making process will have.  The ends aimed at by future individuals are not able to be understood in the present and the means chosen to attain those ends will depend on the individuals involved in the decision making process.  What we can be apodictically certain of though is that violence will continue to be a fact of human existence until a point is arrived at where all individuals believe that non-violent means of human interaction present more effective methods of attaining their desired ends.

 

As for the factors involved in an examination of the likelihood of World War III there is a very pertinent question that must be answered first.  What conflict would constitute World War III, or more practically put, define World War III.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Male
Posts 107
Points 1,990

there must have been some sort of error I meant to reply to a different thread

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (6 items) | RSS