Free Capitalist Network - Community Archive
Mises Community Archive
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Why Did the Colonists Create a Government After Seceding From the British Government?

rated by 0 users
Not Answered This post has 0 verified answers | 11 Replies | 4 Followers

Top 50 Contributor
2,028 Posts
Points 51,580
limitgov posted on Tue, Sep 28 2010 8:33 AM

After the colonists seceded from the British government, why did they feel the need to create another government?

  • | Post Points: 35

All Replies

Top 100 Contributor
814 Posts
Points 16,290

Well, they simply believed in goverment, but they also believed that if their new government got too powerful, then they could have another revolution.   I'm using the Declaration of Independence as my logic.

Thomas Jefferson had no idea how powerful governments can get; if he did, then he probably would've founded the U.S. as a stateless society.

I'm an anarcho-capitalist, but I'm actually indifferent to that and the Articles of Confederation with some slight modifications.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Male
1,899 Posts
Points 37,230

Slave owners and bankers wanted it.

haha. I have no evidence of that, but I bet those are the poeple who most supported a government; the Hamilton/Jefferson dichotomy

In States a fresh law is looked upon as a remedy for evil. Instead of themselves altering what is bad, people begin by demanding a law to alter it. ... In short, a law everywhere and for everything!

~Peter Kropotkin

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
Male
1,289 Posts
Points 18,820
MaikU replied on Tue, Sep 28 2010 10:30 AM

All american people signed social contract and so the Government arose.

"Dude... Roderick Long is the most anarchisty anarchist that has ever anarchisted!" - Evilsceptic

(english is not my native language, sorry for grammar.)

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
2,028 Posts
Points 51,580
limitgov replied on Tue, Sep 28 2010 11:58 AM

"All american people signed social contract"

Only the "founding fathers" signed the piece of paper stating they could tax the colonists.....

the colonists didn't sign that. 

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
Male
1,289 Posts
Points 18,820
MaikU replied on Tue, Sep 28 2010 12:34 PM

I said "social" for a reason! >:(

"Dude... Roderick Long is the most anarchisty anarchist that has ever anarchisted!" - Evilsceptic

(english is not my native language, sorry for grammar.)

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
Male
1,008 Posts
Points 19,520

@limitgov, yeah you didn't know that?  If a group of people who are claimed by most living there to have the ability to rule over them sign a contract, then they get the ability to rule over you whether or not you don't like it.cool

"And it may be said with strict accuracy, that the taste a man may show for absolute government bears an exact ratio to the contempt he may profess for his countrymen." - de Tocqueville
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
134 Posts
Points 2,260

Because they could.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
2,028 Posts
Points 51,580

I'm curious...did the colonists...after just escaping and fighting off a huge government....did they want to form a government at all?

Or go on living as free men?

Someone said slaveholders wanted to form a government...you seemed to be sarcastic...but that makes perfect sense.  Can't really keep a slave and get him returned if he runs away if they're isn't a government to support you.

I wish there was a book on this.  Give the reasons why colonists who didn't want to form a new government...and talk about their reasons.

Right after the American revolution....weren't the states still governments?  Was each state government still in tact?

Perhaps they already had governments....they just wanted to form a federal government....

one to rule them all....

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Male
1,899 Posts
Points 37,230

You should read some Paine.  And the Federalist Papers.  It would give you a good insight.

A lot weren't anti-state per se, more anti nation-state.

In States a fresh law is looked upon as a remedy for evil. Instead of themselves altering what is bad, people begin by demanding a law to alter it. ... In short, a law everywhere and for everything!

~Peter Kropotkin

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Male
1,899 Posts
Points 37,230

@limitgov, yeah you didn't know that?  If a group of people who are claimed by most living there to have the ability to rule over them sign a contract, then they get the ability to rule over you whether or not you don't like it.
 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTduy7Qkvk8

In States a fresh law is looked upon as a remedy for evil. Instead of themselves altering what is bad, people begin by demanding a law to alter it. ... In short, a law everywhere and for everything!

~Peter Kropotkin

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
1,189 Posts
Points 22,990

It's funny because I finished No Treason today.

Freedom has always been the only route to progress.

Post Neo-Left Libertarian Manifesto (PNL lib)
  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (12 items) | RSS