http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-obama-jobs-bill-20110912,0,7380345.story
Call me crazy, but I thought Congress was supposed to be in charge of writing laws, not the president.
When did presidents get the power to write laws? I know they've used sleazy executive orders to create defacto laws, but when did they start outright writing laws? right out in the open?
F*** this guy man. He's out of control and he doesn't know wtf he's doing.
I believe that was the President's way to accrue the employment rate here in the United States. Obama’s Jobs bill is a $447-billion combination of tax cuts and economic reform. One provision of the bill could be greatly helpful for aspiring entrepreneurs. Existing businesses will also benefit if President Obama’s jobs bill passes Congress. Moreover, even aspiring small business owners would be helped by a few major provisions of the bill, because even these small businesses account for a huge number of the jobs generated, especially in bad economies. Isn't that great?
hannamurphy,
how would a program like the SEA allocate the number of people they decide to give money to start a business? And since the money is given to unemployed and/or low credit people, thus increasing the risk, how would a SEA program deal with the consequences of bad investments?
My Blog: http://www.anarchico.net/
Production is 'anarchistic' - Ludwig von Mises
Trololololol
Remember that "reform" doesn't mean "improvement."
Perhaps what you mean by economic reform is extending unemployment benefits? Or raising people's taxes? Or not taking as much of some people's money?
There's one thing that troubles me the most about this "Jobs Bill".
It is said to be a combination of tax cuts and lifting regulatory burdens on business. Sounds sensible on paper.
I am all about ANY reduction in legislation. After seeing it creep up month after month any reversal of the trend as small as it is would be refreshing for a change. If this part of the proposal is well thought it could be really valuable and I want to reserve judgement.
But the tax cuts sound a bit suspect. Yes, I am in favor of tax cuts as the next person, but only when accompanied by an equal spending cut at the very least. So far the "Jobs Bill" hasn't mentioned spending cuts of any sort and the recent shameful political theater about debt ceiling has shown how popular spending cuts are. How does the Obama Administration propose to make up for this shortfall in revenues? We aren't told but I can put forward a the usual three theories: more debt, more inflation, increased taxation in other sectors of the US economy (for example increase duties on fuel to near-European levels). In one way or the other this shortfall will have to be covered by the American public. As is usual in these case it's hoped the resulting economic growth (and hence the increased revenues) will make up for the tax cuts but what if doesn't work out? Experience teaches us even when these plans work out there's always a considerable loss of revenues as growth is nowhere near as spectacular as expected.
It's the old Keynesian public spending hocus pocus raising its ugly head once again, nothing more, nothing less.
hannamurphy:I believe that was the President's way to accrue the employment rate here in the United States. Obama’s Jobs bill is a $447-billion combination of tax cuts and economic reform. One provision of the bill could be greatly helpful for aspiring entrepreneurs. Existing businesses will also benefit if President Obama’s jobs bill passes Congress. Moreover, even aspiringsmall business owners would be helped by a few major provisions of the bill, because even these small businesses account for a huge number of the jobs generated, especially in bad economies. Isn't that great?
No, but this is:
(I'm assuming "hannamurphy" is not a bot.)
The keyboard is mightier than the gun.
Non parit potestas ipsius auctoritatem.
Voluntaryism Forum
For what it's worth, I have found all fruits with mouths that contain teeth to be scary.
Lets enjoy the PR value of MIses.org to promote personal money network dot com!
We are the soldiers for righteousnessAnd we are not sent here by the politicians you drink with - L. Dube, rip