Free Capitalist Network - Community Archive
Mises Community Archive
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

North Dakota state engineered Boom

This post has 6 Replies | 5 Followers

Not Ranked
Posts 99
Points 3,540
aervew Posted: Mon, Dec 5 2011 2:16 PM

 

North Dakota state engineered Boom
 
 http://www.yesmagazine.org/new-economy/the-north-dakota-miracle-not-all-about-oil
 
North Dakota's economy is booming thanks to state owned Bank of North Dakota that is allocating capital exactly as the investments require it, unlike the struggling private banking system in the rest of the country. As a result, it is the lowest unemployment state and looking like the go-to place as even the free market ron paul forumers agree( http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?333983-Seeking-Jobs.-Is-the-boom-in-Williston-N.D.-legit ).
 
So, the myth of efficiency of private sector has another empirical contradiction.
  • | Post Points: 80
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 6,885
Points 121,845
Clayton replied on Mon, Dec 5 2011 3:25 PM

WTF?

http://voluntaryistreader.wordpress.com
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 5,118
Points 87,310
ForumsAdministrator
Moderator
SystemAdministrator

**waits for bubble to burst**

To paraphrase Marc Faber: We're all doomed, but that doesn't mean that we can't make money in the process.
Rabbi Lapin: "Let's make bricks!"
Stephan Kinsella: "Say you and I both want to make a German chocolate cake."

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 150 Contributor
Male
Posts 516
Points 7,190
bbnet replied on Tue, Dec 6 2011 7:07 AM

North Dakota state emgineered Destruction

http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2010/09/16/north-dakota-oil-boom-part-2/
http://www.governing.com/topics/energy-env/north-dakotas-oil-boom-blessing-curse.html

North Dakota's involvement in the oil industry has led to the raping of the environment, rampant violations of private property rights, lowered standards of living for the longtime residents through high price inflation, and extreme degredation to the transportation infrastructure. Large reclaimation fields are filled with toxic chemicals. Oil wells pop up on peoples land without their consent. Cost of living has skyrocketed. Roads and bridges are in disrepair.

So, the myth of compassion of the public sector has another empirical contradiction.

We are the soldiers for righteousness
And we are not sent here by the politicians you drink with - L. Dube, rip

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,028
Points 51,580
limitgov replied on Tue, Dec 6 2011 11:36 AM

"unlike the struggling private banking system"

 

there's nothing free market about banks, if that's what you're implying.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 286
Points 5,555

Okay. I'm done. I officially renounce Austrian eocnomics. 

 

This really takes the cake!

I mean maybe if Austrian economics had someway of explaining how the government can create artificial booms through manipulating the supply of credit, I would buy the whole 'praxeology thing'.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Male
Posts 286
Points 4,665
skylien replied on Wed, Dec 7 2011 6:27 AM

Evilsceptic:
I mean maybe if Austrian economics had someway of explaining how the government can create artificial booms through manipulating the supply of credit, I would buy the whole 'praxeology thing'.

Right. Artificial booms? That's a pure assertion, there is no evidence that something could even exist. Busts are real so booms have to be as well, right? Aren’t they saying that it has something to do with interest rates? Interest is not even a real market phenomenon. They are set by the FED. Without the FED nobody would even know how much interest to ask for in the first place. Interest's sole purpose is to fight inflation. It is stupid to think there are people who actually base their decisions like if they should build a house at all or how big they should make it on something meaningless like interest rates, which would have an effect on the real economy, because it would affect/distort people's valuation/preferences of scarce goods over time... That's just really stupid to think.

"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes, qui custodes custodient? Was that right for 'Who watches the watcher who watches the watchmen?' ? Probably not. Still...your move, my lord." Mr Vimes in THUD!
  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (7 items) | RSS