Free Capitalist Network - Community Archive
Mises Community Archive
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Steven Spielberg's Lincoln Movie - Will It Be Accurate?

rated by 0 users
This post has 12 Replies | 3 Followers

Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,028
Points 51,580
limitgov Posted: Tue, Sep 4 2012 3:55 PM

http://insidemovies.ew.com/2012/08/07/first-look-daniel-day-lewis-lincoln/

Do you think he will be historically accurate with this new movie?

  • | Post Points: 95
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,612
Points 29,515

I doubt it.  It'll make him look like a God among men.

"The Fed does not make predictions. It makes forecasts..." - Mustang19
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 6,953
Points 118,135

It's a Hollywood movie directed by Mr. Hollywood Director, about the #1 response to the question "who's your favorite president of all time"?

What do you think?

 

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 100 Contributor
Posts 814
Points 16,290

No.  Wikipedia has said that it portrays him in a good light and it's made by the same studio that did pearl harbor.   Basically, it's going to be the "disney version" of Lincoln.

Spielberg seems kind of like a dick to me, and this makes me think he's totally dishonest also, as I'm sure he knows better.

The conspirator came out of Hollywood, but that was an exception to the rule.

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,028
Points 51,580
limitgov replied on Wed, Sep 5 2012 11:03 AM

but, spielberg is a good director, in that he knows how to compose amazing shots.  he's the best director, for visual effect, in my opinion.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 4,922
Points 79,590
Autolykos replied on Wed, Sep 5 2012 11:17 AM

Of course it'll be accurate. Don't you know the Union fought the Civil War to end slavery?

trollface.jpg

The keyboard is mightier than the gun.

Non parit potestas ipsius auctoritatem.

Voluntaryism Forum

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 1,711
Points 29,285

Nah. It's Hollywood. This is the place where they showed Darth Vader as a little kid, made billions with a movie about a love story between two blue monkeys, and where Michael Bay swims in the gold that he's made off of fake explosions and stereotypes of the Japanese.

So I doubt it would be accurate.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 496
Points 8,945

no2statism - never seen that movie.  Is it good?  is it supposed  to be accurate?

Eat the apple, fuck the Corps. I don't work for you no more!
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 100 Contributor
Posts 814
Points 16,290

@ grant:  it was pretty good. It got the idea right for the most part, even if there were some historical accuracies in it.  However, the whole movie wasn't a lie like this new disney version of lincoln is.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,485
Points 22,155
Kakugo replied on Wed, Sep 5 2012 3:19 PM

How good it will be can be gauged by the reception Gods and Generals got.

While historians lauded it for being a surprisingly accurate rendition of Stonewall Jackson's career during the Civil War, it caught a ton of flak from critics for, get this, painting the Confederate general in a too favorable light, as being brave, beloved by his men, respected by his foes and, worst of all, a very devoted Christian.

Steven Spielberg got where he is right now because he's an incredibly intelligent man. He knows he cannot stray too far from the mainstream script which says there are are taboo topics, like Lincoln voting as a senator to keep slavery legal south of the Mason-Dixon Line or his interest in Spiritualism (back then it was perfectly acceptable, right now it's "not cool" and hence would detract from the aura of myth surrounding Honest Abe). Of course you can read both of these facts in any history book but remember the general public doesn't read history books. At most they read Wikipedia and propaganda tomes.

Together we go unsung... together we go down with our people
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,028
Points 51,580

i think spielberg got where he is because he is incredibly creative.

the way he shoots scenes is amazing.  i was watching close encounters of the third kind the other night....it seemed much more lower budget, but all his classic style shooting was in it.  real and gritty. 

his camera work is brilliant.  and any new movie maker could learn a ton just from watching and studying spielberg films.

here's a for instance....in war of the worlds....tom cruise is running.....spielberg is moving the camera with him....but just to give you a sense of the running, spielberg throws in a guy riding a bike in the background and a guy on a skaeteboard....so you can sense the speed.....super small detail, but never overlooked by speilberg.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 6,953
Points 118,135

grant.w.underwood:
no2statism - never seen that movie.  Is it good?  is it supposed  to be accurate?

Pearl Harbor?  Everyone made a big deal about Cuba Gooding, Jr. playing a cook of color on one of the ships who actually did end up manning an AA gun after the sailor got killed.  It was a small part for an Oscar winner to play, but everyone was made surely aware that yes, a black man who worked as a cook did actually start shooting a mounted gun during the attack.

You can see info on the overall accuracy here.

But as No2statism said, it's Touchstone, so that should tell you all you need to know.

 

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 113
Points 1,685
RagnarD replied on Wed, Sep 5 2012 7:47 PM

I thought this thread was about the Vampire Hunter movie, I was thinking wow, they're really playing into this joke post.

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (13 items) | RSS