Free Capitalist Network - Community Archive
Mises Community Archive
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Obama plan - We need trade restrictions

rated by 0 users
This post has 10 Replies | 6 Followers

Top 200 Contributor
Male
Posts 397
Points 6,785
bearing01 Posted: Tue, Mar 10 2009 10:49 AM

You can't make this stuff up.  Obama is following the diary of F.D. Roosevelt.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/09/AR2009030903157.html

[...]

the administration is preparing to take a harder line with America's trading partners. It will seek new benchmarks before supporting already-written trade agreements with Colombia and South Korea and is suggesting that it will dig in its heels on global trade talks, demanding that other countries make broader concessions first.  "I believe in trade and will work to expand it, but I also know that not all Americans are winning from it and that our trading partners are not always playing by the rules," Ron Kirk, President Obama's nominee as U.S. trade representative, said in confirmation hearing testimony last night before the Senate Finance Committee.

[...]

In the United States, more Americans are blaming cheap imports for job losses at home and congressional leaders pressed successfully to include a "buy American" provision in the $787 billion stimulus program to give an edge to U.S.-made products.

[...]

"It is true that cheaper foreign products helped squeezed American families stretch their dollars, and the sale of our goods and services abroad support American families," he said. "But it is also true that the overarching benefits of trade are difficult to appreciate when a plant closes in a small community because of increased foreign competition."

[...]

 

 

  • | Post Points: 110
Top 500 Contributor
Male
Posts 178
Points 2,440
nameless replied on Tue, Mar 10 2009 10:59 AM

Why not just raise tariffs by 1000%?  That worked out so well in the '30s!  AMERICA STRONG!!1

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 100 Contributor
Posts 871
Points 21,030
eliotn replied on Tue, Mar 10 2009 11:02 AM

Yeah, doesn't Obama realize that he would not be this powerful if it weren't for trade.  If people were prevented from trading, we would be barbarians!

Schools are labour camps.

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 500 Contributor
Male
Posts 313
Points 6,560
Eric replied on Tue, Mar 10 2009 11:31 AM

This sounds like a great idea that has never been tried before!! St. Obama is going to bring hope back to America.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 200 Contributor
Male
Posts 397
Points 6,785
bearing01 replied on Tue, Mar 10 2009 11:31 AM

Yes, we all would be much better off if our imports (which is almost everything people are buying now days) were much more expensive.  Also, better off if foreigners were putting tariffs on their American imports.  Americans need all the help they can get trying to export what we have to offer the rest of the world.  Reciprocal tariffs to hinder trade will only reduce the efficiency of the division of labor and make the depression harder & more expensive to bare.  As if the price inflation about to be inflicted upon us wasn't enough.

 

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 100 Contributor
Posts 871
Points 21,030
eliotn replied on Tue, Mar 10 2009 11:49 AM

Eric:

Devil_

This sounds like a great idea that has never been tried before!! St. Obama is going to bring hope back to America.

Once people are desperately poor, they will hope for anything!Devil

 

Schools are labour camps.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 283
Points 5,355

How does the effects of US protectionism relate to the fact that so many dollars are held outside of the US?

When it gets more difficult to exchange foreign made goods for dollar, then the dollar flow to foreigners will be lower, its supply strangled. But at the same time dollars become less useful outside of the US, don't they?

What effect would increased protectionism have on the purchasing power of the dollar, and to the international demand and use of dollar?

 

Americans should reduce consumption by saving more. Now they will maybe lower consumption because protectionism makes consumer goods more expensive. That's half of a right ! Big Smile

It's not fascism when the government does it.

“We must spend now as an investment for the future.” - President Obama

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 100 Contributor
Male
Posts 867
Points 17,790
Sphairon replied on Tue, Mar 10 2009 3:58 PM

bearing01:
"It is true that cheaper foreign products helped squeezed American families stretch their dollars, and the sale of our goods and services abroad support American families," he said. "But it is also true that the overarching benefits of trade are difficult to appreciate when a plant closes in a small community because of increased foreign competition."

Sort of reminds me of this gem.


  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 9
Points 35
heki66 replied on Thu, Mar 12 2009 8:48 AM

Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE

I found some very interesting thoughts on this subject in the book called The Age of Nepotism, you should look it up and read about current affairs in the world from the perspective of Iranian American entrepreneur traveling through the Balkans. There is also a site www.theageofnepotism.com

 

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Male
Posts 248
Points 4,355
Eric replied on Thu, Mar 12 2009 9:41 AM

Love how people call libertarians isolationists yet they support this.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 1,687
Points 22,990
Bogart replied on Thu, Mar 12 2009 10:08 AM

This is why I can't stand Republicans and Democrats:  Bush and Obama are just the same.  Bush had his little steel tariff and Obama wants to lock out foreign (Translate US-NON Union Approved) suppliers from bidding on the giant pork projects.  Obama like Bush lied about most stuff but Obama was truthful about his statement that "more Americans blame" because it is the freedom hating scum like Obama and Bush that promote these lies.

I hear this from one of my senators and the governor here in Ohio and idiotic thing is that the state of Ohio is one of the biggest exporters outside costal states in the US.  It is back to Smoot-Hawley and its incredible amplification of the wealth destruction policies of Hoover and Rosevelt.  Whaterver the political damage that the Democrats and Republicans did, the tariffs made it worse.

Oh, they also blamed immigrants for part of this.  Both parties are economically ignorant and are trying to destroy the country.

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (11 items) | RSS