Free Capitalist Network - Community Archive
Mises Community Archive
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

The snake that ate itself

rated by 0 users
This post has 16 Replies | 3 Followers

Not Ranked
Male
Posts 28
Points 1,010
slugmises Posted: Tue, Feb 16 2010 10:39 PM

Once government provides funding for psychological services, as they will have to as long as science continues to support the mind/body connection, people will have a clearer view of the world - one that is not clouded by the miseries of their personal lives. They will understand themselves better, and in turn, understand the world and other relationships better. They'll understand violence does not work, nor intimidation, and the old ways of going about things will fade into history just as chattel slavery once did.

Relationships to ourselves and to others will be redefined.

You may say government is inefficient and the market could do it better, and I'd agree. However, this is the track I think we're going on and it is one that will benefit us in the long-run. Government will see how stress and mental problems are dramatically influencing diseases and they'll come to the only conclusion that these services would save money in the long-run. If it were any other time in history, I'd agree with what you're probably thinking, "government isn't smart or efficient enough to figure that out," but in our technologically advanced era, people will see this fast and BEG for it.

I think this is one route for government to go that anarchists could secretly support.

Thoughts?

  • | Post Points: 65
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 342
Points 7,875

I know this is simply not what you're looking forward to hear, but as long as the state is around, there will be plenty of violence and intimidation to go around.

 

Regardless of what the state-subsidized science(s) may say.

 

It would also be an utter squandering of taxpayers funds as well. 

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 150 Contributor
Male
Posts 653
Points 13,185

Rothbard has a great essay on here about scientific research and development, and how it pertains to the state.  I would disagree with your conclusions, and I think he would too.

they said we would have an unfair fun advantage

"enough about human rights. what about whale rights?" -moondog
  • | Post Points: 20
Not Ranked
Male
Posts 15
Points 210
Chris replied on Tue, Feb 23 2010 6:20 PM

I actually thought about making the "snake that eats itself" as the symbol for an organization I'm starting called The Justice League (like the comic book.)  I don't think government will provide funding for psychological services - it seems more likely to fund better ways to sedate people into working zombies.  The government doesn't seem to care about people - it cares about power.  But I agree that psychological services are what people need these days.  It's becoming more and more necessary now that man has reached the point that his only predator is himself.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 150 Contributor
Male
Posts 527
Points 8,490

slugmises:
Thoughts?

No. No market forces to support efficiency, all psychologists in the long run will be soulless drones that provide no help.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 2,943
Points 49,130
SystemAdministrator
Conza88 replied on Tue, Feb 23 2010 7:20 PM

mikachusetts:

Rothbard has a great essay on here about scientific research and development, and how it pertains to the state.  I would disagree with your conclusions, and I think he would too.

Surprise Thanks! Never heard of this one mentioned before, anywhere.

Ron Paul is for self-government when compared to the Constitution. He's an anarcho-capitalist. Proof.
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 150 Contributor
Male
Posts 690
Points 11,315

slugmises:

Once government provides funding for psychological services, as they will have to as long as science continues to support the mind/body connection, people will have a clearer view of the world - one that is not clouded by the miseries of their personal lives. They will understand themselves better, and in turn, understand the world and other relationships better. They'll understand violence does not work, nor intimidation, and the old ways of going about things will fade into history just as chattel slavery once did.

Relationships to ourselves and to others will be redefined.

You may say government is inefficient and the market could do it better, and I'd agree. However, this is the track I think we're going on and it is one that will benefit us in the long-run. Government will see how stress and mental problems are dramatically influencing diseases and they'll come to the only conclusion that these services would save money in the long-run. If it were any other time in history, I'd agree with what you're probably thinking, "government isn't smart or efficient enough to figure that out," but in our technologically advanced era, people will see this fast and BEG for it.

I think this is one route for government to go that anarchists could secretly support.

Thoughts?

You appear to be unfamiliar both with the novel "Brave New World", and with the writings/work of the psychologist Thomas Szasz.

Regards, onebornfree.

 

For more information about onebornfree, please see profile.[ i.e. click on forum name "onebornfree"].

  • | Post Points: 20
Not Ranked
Male
Posts 28
Points 1,010
slugmises replied on Wed, Feb 24 2010 12:24 AM

Thanks mikachusetts and onebornfree for the links, I will read them when I get a chance.

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 1,945
Points 36,550

Let's not forget, the chemical compounds that will do away with the state already exist, and the reactionary state has outlawed them.  They are called psychedelics.

"What Stirner says is a word, a thought, a concept; what he means is no word, no thought, no concept. What he says is not what is meant, and what he means is unsayable." - Max Stirner, Stirner's Critics
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 150 Contributor
Male
Posts 690
Points 11,315

slugmises:

Thanks mikachusetts and onebornfree for the links, I will read them when I get a chance.

Let me know if you do not understand why I linked to them- regards, onebornfree.

 

For more information about onebornfree, please see profile.[ i.e. click on forum name "onebornfree"].

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 2,221
Points 34,050
Moderator

Jackson LaRose:

Let's not forget, the chemical compounds that will do away with the state already exist, and the reactionary state has outlawed them.  They are called psychedelics.

Assumption. 

Plenty of hippie idiots do psychedelics & smoke pot & still end up having the most passive aggressive , apathetic & cynical rationalizations for state sanctioned coercion & involuntaryism. 

As long as no is coercing their solipsistic universe, it's all good to them. 

To sum it up: "What's your problem, man, just be cool (with our collectivism)."

"Look at me, I'm quoting another user to show how wrong I think they are, out of arrogance of my own position. Wait, this is my own quote, oh shi-" ~ Nitroadict

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 1,945
Points 36,550

Nitroadict:
Plenty of hippie idiots do psychedelics & smoke pot & still end up having the most passive aggressive , apathetic & cynical rationalizations for state sanctioned coercion & involuntaryism. 

And lots of people still get into car accidents.  Doesn't mean cars aren't useful tools, as long as you can handle them.  Of course, that doesn't mean everyone knows how to drive.

And I'm not talking about taking a hit, or eating a cap or two, to "see the pretty colors", I'm talking a face-melting, strapped to a rocket DMT-fueled blast into hyper-dimensional reality, or maybe a 48 hour horror filled experience with iboga, or 1000 ug liquid LSD.  That would weed out the half-hearted wannabes rather quickly.

"What Stirner says is a word, a thought, a concept; what he means is no word, no thought, no concept. What he says is not what is meant, and what he means is unsayable." - Max Stirner, Stirner's Critics
  • | Post Points: 35
Not Ranked
Male
Posts 15
Points 210
Chris replied on Wed, Feb 24 2010 7:27 PM

Jackson LaRose:
That would weed out the half-hearted wannabes rather quickly.

 

Lol.  At the very least they'd be completely new people when it's all over!

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 2,221
Points 34,050
Moderator

Jackson LaRose:

Nitroadict:
Plenty of hippie idiots do psychedelics & smoke pot & still end up having the most passive aggressive , apathetic & cynical rationalizations for state sanctioned coercion & involuntaryism. 

And lots of people still get into car accidents.  Doesn't mean cars aren't useful tools, as long as you can handle them.  Of course, that doesn't mean everyone knows how to drive.

And I'm not talking about taking a hit, or eating a cap or two, to "see the pretty colors", I'm talking a face-melting, strapped to a rocket DMT-fueled blast into hyper-dimensional reality, or maybe a 48 hour horror filled experience with iboga, or 1000 ug liquid LSD.  That would weed out the half-hearted wannabes rather quickly.

Again, your assuming that every individual will somehow be forced to question fundamentals, permanently, when every individuals reacts differently post-trip wise. 

Sometimes a trip is just a trip.

"Look at me, I'm quoting another user to show how wrong I think they are, out of arrogance of my own position. Wait, this is my own quote, oh shi-" ~ Nitroadict

  • | Post Points: 20
Not Ranked
Male
Posts 28
Points 1,010
slugmises replied on Wed, Feb 24 2010 10:48 PM

Onebornfree, I want to clarify that when I said psychological services and mind/body connection I did not mean psychiatry and drugs as Szasz specializes in. Surely, if we went that route with government, things could get ugly fast. So now that I think of it, it's best to not even go in that direction.

 

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 1,945
Points 36,550

Nitroadict:
Sometimes a trip is just a trip.

Not if it is hard enough.

"What Stirner says is a word, a thought, a concept; what he means is no word, no thought, no concept. What he says is not what is meant, and what he means is unsayable." - Max Stirner, Stirner's Critics
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 150 Contributor
Male
Posts 690
Points 11,315

slugmises:

Surely, if we went that route with government, things could get ugly fast. So now that I think of it, it's best to not even go in that direction.

 

Things "get ugly fast" whenever, and whatever governments get involved in, [including psychology and psychiatry]Smile

Regards, onebornfree.

 

For more information about onebornfree, please see profile.[ i.e. click on forum name "onebornfree"].

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (17 items) | RSS